”Put the Environment at the Center of the Global Economy: An Argument for the Eco-Currency” (The Hangyoreh, May 14, 2013)

The Hangyoreh

”Put the Environment at the Center of the Global Economy: An Argument for the Eco-Currency”

May 14, 2013

Emanuel Pastreich

The environmental challenges we face today, from spreading deserts to rising oceans compel us to reconsider the conventional concepts of growth and recognize that they cannot be easily reconciled with the dangerous implications of runaway consumption and unlimited development.

Above all we must get away from a speculative economy born of an irrational dependence on finance, which has becoming increasingly unstable as digital technology accelerates and financial transactions take place any objective review. We must return to a stable and long-term economy. In part that process concerns the restoration of regulation on the banking system but also the change must involve the very conception of finance and banking. Finance must be aimed at stable, long-term projects which have relevance for ordinary people.

Nothing could possibly be more helpful in this process than large scale projects to restore the environment and address the damage done to the climate by human activity. These projects are absolutely necessary for human survival and they will take decades, if not centuries, to complete. By grounding the economy in adaptation and mitigation, we can return to a predictable system in which green bonds in 30-50 year projects directly related to our well-being are dominant and we can escape from the flighty digital economy of thousands-per-second transactions.

In addition to the development of “green bonds” system for funding long-term meaningful projects to address the climate crisis, we should also consider the role of currency itself. We are engaged in a dangerous race to devalue currency around the world in the expectation of increasing advantage in trade. This activity is profoundly destabilizing for our economy and at a higher level also causes chaos in the process by which we assign value in general.

The solution to both the problem of currency and of climate change is obvious: we must hardwire the health of the ecosystem directly to the standard measurements of economic health so that the state of the environment is immediately visible in all economic transactions. Global finance, trade and investment must all be conducted within a system that makes the preservation of the climate, rather than profit, the highest priority.

One possible approach is the introduction of a global “eco-currency.” The international community would establish an international currency, an “eco-currency,” whose value is linked directly to the state of the climate (both globally and locally) and that currency would serve either as a universal currency within which international transactions take place, or it could be a factor that significantly impacts all the global currencies.

Such an eco-currency would require a calculation of the state of the environment on which its value would be based. First we need to come up with a system for evaluating the state of the environment in real time which could be converted into a set of figures for the calculation of the total state of the global and the local ecosystems. That set of figures would then be the basis for the eco-currency’s value. Such a system would be complex and far from perfect, but it would be a massive improvement over the current factors employed in calculating gross domestic product which are limited to consumption and production and exclude the state of the environment entirely.

There exist indices such as Yale’s Environmental Performance Index that do part of that process, but so far there is no total agreed on standard for evaluating the state of the total environment that could be used to periodically measure the state of the environment in a manner that could be employed as a universal reference. Only then could the amount of, or the value of, the eco-currency possessed by a nation reflect an objective evaluation of the health of the climate.

If the eco-currency were to serve as one of several factors impacting all global currencies, it might serve as an instrument akin to the SDR (special drawing rights) system currently employed by the International Monetary Fund. According to the IMF website, member [nations] with sufficiently strong external positions are designated by the Fund to buy SDR s with freely usable currencies up to certain amounts from members with weak external positions. In the case of the eco-currency, that strong external position could be redefined so as to consist primarily, or entirely, of environmental criterion.

The eco currency could alternatively serve as a gold standard for all nations of the world, permitting each nation to increase its money supply in direct proportion to the environmental credits that it has accumulated through wise and effective policies by reducing emissions and preserving water and soil.

After all, in that the previous gold standard was based on a mineral that was exceptionally rare and valuable, so it could be a logical extension of that concept to argue that a healthy ecosystem is the most valuable commodity available. The ecosystem is far more valuable to human society than is gold. Each nation would continue to have sovereignty with regards to its own currency, but the calculation of each currency’s exchange rate would take into account the environmental status of the country and its share of a calculated total of environmental credits for the entire world.

The serious problems faced by the European emissions trading system suggest that we need to move bravely to a new approach to putting the environment itself, and not merely carbon emissions, at the center of our calculations of the economy. An international currency program based on environmental credits as part of a total biosphere would make the environmental crisis visible in the financial world. The eco-currency could be the first step towards forcing those making fiscal and developmental policy at the national and international level to engage in a serious debate on the implications of their policies for the climate. No longer would it be possible to think separately about monetary policy and environmental policy; the two would be effectively yoked together.

original post

One response to “”Put the Environment at the Center of the Global Economy: An Argument for the Eco-Currency” (The Hangyoreh, May 14, 2013)

  1. Jong Chan Park May 14, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    Dear Dr. Emanuel,
    First of all, thank you for your love and caring for environment. The idea of eco-currency will make the value of nature ‘visible’ to people, especially to economists, investors and policy makers.
    I, too, agree with the point that we should find a way to recognize the value of environment.

    But, I am afraid to say this, Is transformation of the environmental value to currency a rightful way to look at the value of environment?
    My answer is no, because the mere calculation and quantification cannot represent the total value of environment. At best, it’s going to show only economical value of environment.
    If you value a ton of trees as a ton of paper and furniture, and even if you consider the benefit of oxygen the trees produce and the prevention of flood by trees, this quantification must miss one important value inside of nature: the human’s respect and awe toward trees and nature inside of our mind.
    It’s same as this: we cannot value the cross as just two pieces of stick.

    The true solution lies on this question. How can we foster the love and respect for environment?
    In my humble opinion, making people to appreciate the joy of being friendly environment and the beauty of nature are better solutions. Building bicycle roads along beautiful seashores, promoting artists and writers who express and share the emotions toward good environment, or having teachings of buddhism to awake people to realize the importance of environment… and so on.

    To sum up, we should find a way to “feel” the value of environment, rather then see it.

    You and I have different position to preserve environment, but it is always nice to discover another perspective to see one issue.
    If you have a interest on what money can’t/shouldn’t buy, and today’s moral limits of markets, I recommend you to read ‘What Money Can’t Buy’ written by Michael Sandel. This book is somewhat related on the idea I write on today. He argues that there are some things we shouldn’t buy with money(or should I say we shouldn’t quantify to money?) and makes us to ponder what is the boundery of market it should play on, and also suggests us to talk about the moral aspects of buying and selling.

    Thank you, Dr. Emanuel Pastreich.

    With respect,
    JongChan, Park.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: