Yes, of course there was a scientific basis for the mask mandates and the social distancing policies enacted around the world that have destroyed human civilization and concentrated wealth in the hands of the very, very few. Masks and social distancing was based on real science, on real experiments. The experiments were carried out in places like the Guantánamo Bay Detention Center set up by the Bush administration on January 11, 2002; set up in a legal grey zone, on land that did not belong to anyone, and thus could be taken over by military contractors, private equity and a host of parasitic interest groups which have still yet to have their masks ripped off.
Here they conducted the experiments on how to destroy the human mind, how to modify behavior through psychological trauma and the repetition of mindless patterns and rituals until the weaknesses of the brain were fully exploited.
Then they went global, like Amazon or Facebook, like Twitter or Oracle, with their technology for destroying the human will, for collapsing the ability of citizens to think for themselves.
The entire world is subject to unending trauma and the repetition of falsehoods in accord with those experiments. That is the science of COVID-19.
Of course they blame in the Chinese Communist Party, or the Jesuits and the Masons. That blame is not 100% wrong, but everyone knows that it is not the whole truth, not even close.
Who was behind these gruesome experiments? That is what we must demand now. We do not have much time.
Also, we cannot be so intellectually lazy, so ethically sloppy as to blame the just CIA and the Pentagon. Those attack dogs were horrific, but they were just taking orders from behind the curtain. Do we have the bravery to pull back that curtain?
Unlike the Eucharist of the Church wherein Jesus proclaims,
“This is My Body. This is My Blood.”
And he thereby raises humanity to a higher spiritual level, allowing humans to be transformed through that act of consumption so as to be one with God, multinational pharmaceutical corporations and their globalist backers today are carrying out a “reverse Eucharist,” a perversion of the Eucharist that is driven by evil incarnate.
In this foul reverse Eucharist, in this unholy process, multinational corporations, the false institutions of global governance owned by the wicked, and the evil spirits of the super-rich, a horrific trinity of Mammon, speaks unto us, saying the opposite of Jesus. They say, rather,
“Your body is ours. Your blood is ours.”
They have the right given to them by their false god to inject you with any poison they wish and to transform you, not into something closer to God, but rather to transform you through a black consubstantiation into a GMO, into cow or pig that is tagged with a QR code and then led along to slaughter.
Rather than giving out wafers and wine to represent the grace of god, this black trinity forces vaccines on humanity so as to prepare us for the blood sacrifice before the horrid false god Mammon.
대안 미디어, 특히 스스로 “보수”를 자처하는 이들의 대안 미디어 가운데서 코로나19 “백신”으로 인구를 죽여 감소시키고 기업 엘리트들이 유엔과 세계보건기구(WHO)의 이름을 이용하여 공작한 거대한 사기에 대한 통찰력을 제공하는 방식에 대한 상세하고 종종 꽤 정확한 정보를 제공하는 것이 흔한 일이 되어 왔습니다. 그러나 이 블로그들에 따르면 이 행동에 대한 모든 궁극적인 책임은 중화인민공화국의 중국 공산당에 있습니다.
대부분의 경우 결론은 중국에서 미국이 공산주의자들의 공격을 받고 있고, 반역 행위를 방조한 미국 내 민주당원들은 “좌파”라는 것입니다. 한국국내에도 보수언론이 같은식으로 문재인정권을 “친중”이라고 비판 합니다.
미국과 전 세계적으로 중국 공산당의 행동에 대한 우려가 근거가 없는 것은 아닙니다. 강력한 기업 이익, 중국의 슈퍼 리치들이 중국 공산당의 권위를 이용해 자신들의 이익을 증진시키는 사례가 있습니다. 하지만 미국의 “기업 파시스트”들에 의해 저질러진 범죄들이 중국 공산당에 속아 넘어가고, 국내의 진짜 악의 근원으로부터 관심을 다른 곳으로 돌리는 단순한 해석은 우리가 신중하게 조직된 허위 정보 캠페인을 보고 있다는 것을 암시합니다. 이들은 아마도 골드만 삭스, 블랙락, 모건 스탠리의 금융 엘리트들에 의해 자금 지원을 받고 있을 것입니다.
중국 공산당을 공격하는 목적은 우리를 쫓아버리고, 우리가 내부의 적을 알아내지 못하게 하는 것입니다. 마이크로소프트, 코카콜라, 페이스북, 오라클, 월마트, 아마존 (삼성, 현재, 카카오, 쿠팡) 과 같이 친숙한 브랜드들은 미국 과 한국을 강제 수용소로 만들고 있는, 국내 만연한 범죄 정책의 주요 원천이며 아마도 가까운 미래에 죽음의 수용소가 될 것입니다.
이러한 기업들은 슈퍼 리치들의 장난거리입니다. 이들은 중국 엘리트들과 비밀리에 거래를 하기도 합니다.
간단히 말해, 중국 공산당을 탓하는 이런 심리적 작전은 국내 파시즘의 쓰라린 현실에 대한 국민들의 이해를 최후의 순간까지 미루고 급진적 계급사회의 성장을 흐리게 하기 위한 것입니다.
“중국의 위협”을 과장하는 것은 슈퍼 리치들이 꾸민 방해입니다. 요점은 “당신이 외부 문명에서 온 외국인들”에게 입에 거품을 물게 해서 평범한 사람들의 삶을 파괴하려는 부자들의 음모를 이해할 수 없게 만드는 것입니다.
미국, 중국, 러시아, 이스라엘, 터키, 독일, 일본 및 기타 주요 강대국들의 기업 이익의 정치적 행동에 대한 대다수의 정보는 기밀로 취급되며 일반 국민들은 완전히 접근이 불가합니다. 우리는 먼저 우리가 아는 것이 얼마나 적은지 깨달아야 합니다.
지정학을 논하는 블로거들은 대부분 대중소비를 위해 만들어진 선정적인 이야기에만 스스로를 국한시키고, 중국과 미국의 엘리트들이 가짜 냉전을 만들어 일반 국민들 사이의 의미 있는 대화를 차단하고 수익을 증대시켰을 가능성은 언급조차 못합니다.
이러한 오류는 우연이 아닙니다. 자칭 전문가라 하는 그들은 계급 문제에 대한 언급을 거부합니다.
중국공산당은 중화인민공화국 정부의 일부로서 이론적으로는 인민을 대표하는 막대한 기관입니다.
중국공산당은 과거 엄격한 규제를 받았지만, 지난 20년 동안 규제가 철폐되었고, 현재 라이온스 클럽과 같은 조직의 많은 부분이 운영되고 있습니다. 중국공산당의 큰 부분은 친구와 가족을 위해 이윤을 추구하는 권력자들의 네트워크를 형성하지 정부 기관으로서의 기능을 하지 않습니다.
이것은 중국인들에겐 흔히 알려진 사실이며 국내에는 개혁과 진지한 노력에 대한 요구가 있습니다.
중국공산당 내에는 또한 1940년대와 1950년대의 당 전통을 되살려 다국적 은행이 아닌 노동자 편에 서려는 파벌들도 있고 그들의 수가 증가하고 있습니다.
미국의 민주당과 공화당은 비공개로 국가정책을 만든다는 점에서 중국공산당하고 같지만, 그 역할이 헌법에 규정되어 있지 않고 정부의 책임 있는 일부도 아닙니다.
기업 언론과 보수 블로그의 추진 배경에는 미국의 제도적 부패로부터 벗어날 수 있도록 중국공산당을 악역으로 몬 구체적인 목표가 있습니다.
자유의 상실과 미국 경제의 의도적 파괴에 대한 탓을 미국 금융의 소산인 기업 파시즘이 아닌 “공산주의”와 “좌파주의”로 교묘히 돌리는 것입니다.
의도적으로 “기업 파시즘”을 “공산주의”로 오인하고 미국 CEO들의 범죄 계획을 외부 문명에 속하는 기만적인 중국공산당으로 돌리는 것은 19세기 미국을 지배했던 “황화” (黃禍)신화를 정치적 통제 수단으로 재창조하고자 조직된 최고 수준의 심리 작전입니다.
워싱턴 DC에서 먼, 중국에 만연한 범죄를 뒤집어씌우고 외국인이 지배적인 드라마를 만들어 비밀스러운 중국공산당은 미국내에 악이 얼마나 가까이 침투해 있는지에 대해 눈을 가리도록 합니다. 아마존, 페이스북, 뱅크오브아메리카, 코카콜라, 월마트, 마이크로소프트와 같이 미국에서 익숙한 브랜드 이름으로 태어난 범죄는 가려져 있고, 미국인들은 심지어 인식된 중국의 위협에 대응하여 이러한 위험한 외국 조직들을 “미국” 법인으로 받아들이도록 장려되고 있습니다.
하지만 이 다국적 기업들은 중국 공산당과 마찬가지로 의회에서 증언을 하고 로비 활동을 할 권리가 없습니다. 그들은 전 세계의 슈퍼 리치, 국적 초월자들, 그리고 주주들에게 이익을 제공합니다.
중국 공산당의 악마화는 군수 공단의 지지를 받고 있는데, 이는 중국과의 전쟁이 일어날 것을 가정한 미국의 전시 경제 구축의 핵심이기 때문입니다.
급격한 금융 규제 완화의 결과로 미국 경제가 아노미 상태로 무너지면서 전쟁 경제가 구원책으로 인식되고 있습니다. 미 국방부를 통해 전쟁경제가 운영되도록 하면 다국적 기업들의 상당한 이익이 보장됩니다.
게다가 미국의 사법부, 입법부, 행정부의 부패는 군대가 정부에서 부분적으로나마 기능을 하는 유일한 부분이기 때문에, 군대의 역할이 점점 더 중요해지는 환경을 조성했습니다.
일반 중국인과 미국인의 대화가 불가능하고, 양국 내 관련 국민들 간의 연대가 성립되지 않으며, 양국 지식인 간의 대화를 추구할 수 없는 상황은 “신냉전” 조성에 매우 중요합니다.
국민들이 서로 대화를 한다면, 다국적 기업들이 양국의 경제를 파괴하기 위해 어떻게 중국과 미국의 노동자들을 서로 속이고 있는지 알 수 있기 때문입니다.
보수 대안 미디어에서 발견되는 중국공산당과 민주당의 “좌파”에 대한 공격은 기업 파시즘의 사회경제적 결과와 잘못 연결된 대중의 상상 속에서 “공산주의”, “사회주의”, “좌파주의” 같은 용어를 부정적으로 낙인찍는 역할을 합니다.
30년대에는 미국 공산당이 흑인 민권 투쟁을 주도하고, 좌파가 오늘날 미국 노동자가 누리는 많은 복지혜택을 위해 투쟁했던 방식은 위협적인 중국 문화에 “사회주의”를 결부시키는 이러한 반좌파 운동 가운데 의도적으로 가려져 있습니다.
아마도 가장 일탈적인 게임은, 미국인들이 코로나19 정권을 비판하는 목소리를 찾기를 원한다면, 반좌파, 반중국, 나아가 반아시아 이데올로기를 선택하도록 강요하는 경우일 것입니다.
언론에 등장하는 좌파들은 백신 접종을 찬성하는 사람들이고 우리가 보는 백신에 대한 유일한 반대자들은 도널드 트럼프의 우파 추종자들입니다. 이러한 정치적 구성은 좌파 및 진보주의자들로 하여금 백신의 명백한 위험을 반발의 두려움 없이 무시할 수 있게 합니다.
모든 것을 기만적인 중국공산당의 탓으로 돌리는 것은 미국에서 누가 무엇을 소유하고 있는지, 그리고 부의 편중이 일반 사람들에게 진정으로 어떤 영향을 미치는지에 대한 진지한 분석을 하나도 하지 않도록 하는 교묘한 기피 방법입니다.
만약 국민들이 이 억만장자들이 혁신과 상상력을 통해서가 아니라 미국민들 소유인 연방준비제도이사회에서 현금을 훔치고 국민들을 처벌하는 인플레이션을 야기함으로써 큰 재산을 벌어들인 방법을 알게 된다면, 억만장자들을 감옥에 넣어야 한다고 요구하고 있을 것입니다.
국민들이 이해할 수 없는 애매한 중국공산당 탓으로 돌리는 것은 누가 무엇을 소유하고, 어떻게 인수했는지에 대한 논의를 피하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
중국 공산당과 관련된 부패와 권력 남용의 예가 있습니다. 이 부분은 확실히 사실인 이야기입니다. 그러나 중국 공산당의 악마화의 궁극적인 목표는 명백히 (요즘 급상승하고 있는) 워싱턴 DC에서 외국의 영향력을 줄이는 것이 아니라 오히려 미국 사회의 뿌리깊은 도덕적 부패를 설명하는 편리하지만 잘못된 방법을 찾는 것입니다.
It has become common practice in the alternative media, especially those parts of the alternative media which provide detailed, and often quite accurate data about the manner in which COVID-19 “vaccines” are employed to kill off the population and to offer insights into the enormous frauds engineered by corporate elites using the names of the United Nations and the World Health Organization.
But in many of these blog reports the blame of the actions pertaining to Covid-19 are casually attributed to the Chinese Communist Party of the People’s Republic of China.
In some cases, the conclusion of these reports is that the United States is under assault from communists in China and that the Democrats in the United States who abet its acts of treason are “Leftists.”
Concerns about actions of the Chinese Communist Party CCP in the United States, and globally, are not without evidence.
There are examples of powerful business interests, and the super-rich, in China making use of the authority of the Chinese Communist Party to advance their interests. Yet, the simplistic and reductive manner in which the crimes committed by corporate elites and billionaires in the United States are fobbed off on the CCP, and attention is diverted away from “the true sources of evil” at home, suggests that we are looking at a carefully organized disinformation campaign, most likely one that is funded by the financial elites at Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, et al.
The point of attacking the CCP is to throw us off of the scent, to keep us from identifying the enemy within. Familiar brands like Microsoft, Coca Cola, Facebook, Oracle, Walmart and Amazon are the primary source of the rampant criminal policies at home that are turning the nation into a concentration camp.
Those corporations are the playthings of the superrich—who make their deals, sometimes with the Chinese elites as well, behind closed doors.
To put it simply, this psychological operation of blaming the Chinese Communist Party is meant to delay understanding among citizens of the bitter reality of fascism at home until the last possible moment and to obscure the growth of a radical class society.
The hyping of the “China threat” is a distraction set up by the super-rich. The point is to get you foaming at the mouth over foreigners from an alien civilization and thus unable to comprehend the conspiracy of the rich to destroy the lives of ordinary people.
The vast majority of information about the political actions of corporate interests, under the cloak of government, in the United States, China, Russia, Israel, Turkey, Germany, Japan and other major powers, is classified and completely inaccessible to ordinary citizens. We must first understand just how little we know.
Focusing exclusively on the CCP, however, makes sure that no one asks any serious questions about who the important foreign powers besides China are in DC. Moreover, citizens assume that Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft are “American” companies even as those criminal organizations plot to take the United States apart.
Most bloggers who discuss geopolitics limit themselves to sensationalist stories created for public consumption and they cannot even mention the possibility that Chinese and American elites created a bogus cold war so as block meaningful dialogue between ordinary citizens and increase their profits.
That oversight is not an accident. Those self-appointed experts refuse to address the question of class.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is a massive institution that is a part of the government of the People’s Republic of China and it represents, in theory, the people.
The CCP previously was strictly regulated. Over the last 20 years, however, it has been deregulated and large sections of the organization are run today like the Lion’s Club. Large sections of the CCP form a network of the powerful who pursue profits for friends and family, and not functioning as a government agency.
This is no secret to the Chinese and there are demands at home for reform, and serious efforts. There are also factions within the CCP who wish to revive the traditions of the party from the 1940s and 1950s, to stand with the workers, not with multinational banks. Their numbers are growing.
The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are worse than the CCP in that they make national policy behind closed doors, but their role is not defined by the Constitution and they are not an accountable part of the government.
There are specific goals behind the push by the corporate media, and the conservative blogs, that set the CCP up as the bad man so as to distract from the institutional decay in the United States.
1) To deviously attribute the loss of freedom and the intentional destruction of the US economy to “communism” and “leftism” rather than to the corporate fascism that is the offspring of American finance.
Intentionally mislabeling “corporate fascism” as “communism” and attributing the criminal plans of American CEOs to a devious CCP that belongs to an alien civilization is a psychological operation orchestrated at the highest levels that reinvents the “Yellow Peril” mythologies that dominated the United States in the 19th century as a tool of political control.
2) The projection of rampant criminality onto China, and away from Washington D.C., through the creation of a drama dominated by an alien and mysterious CCP serves to obscure just how close to home is evil in the United States.
The criminality born of familiar brand names in the United States such as Amazon, Facebook, Bank of America, Coca Cola, Walmart and Microsoft is obscured, and Americans are even encouraged to embrace these dangerous foreign entities as “American” corporations in response to a perceived Chinese threat.
But these multinational corporations have no more right to give testimony in Congress and lobby than does the CCP. They provide profits to the superrich, men who know no country, and to stockholders around the globe.
3) The demonization of the CCP is supported by the military industrial complex because this invented existential threat is central to the establishment of a war economy in the United States that assumes that there will be a war with China.
As the United States economy collapses into anomy as a result of the radical deregulation of finance, a war-time economy is increasing perceived as the salvation. Making sure that war economy is run through the Pentagon assures multinational corporations that get a thick slice of the pie.
Moreover, the decay of the judiciary, the legislative and the executive in the United States has created an environment in which the military has an increasingly important role because it is the only part of government that is still partially functional.
4) It is critical for the “new cold war” that no discourse between ordinary Chinese and Americans is possible, no alliances between concerned citizens in both countries are established, no conversations between intellectuals in the two countries can be pursued.
If citizens spoke with citizens, they might figure out how multinational corporations are playing Chinese and American workers off against each other as they proceed to destroy the economies of both countries.
5) The attack on the CCP and on the “leftists” in the Democratic Party found in the conservative alternative media serves to brand the term like “communism,” “socialism” and “leftism” as negatives in the public imagination that are falsely associated with the social and economic consequences of the policies of “corporate fascism”.
The manner in which the Communist Party USA led the battle for civil rights, and the left fought for many of the benefits that workers enjoy today is intentionally obscured in these anti-leftist campaigns that tie “socialism” to a threatening Chinese culture.
6) Perhaps the most devious game of all is forcing Americans to choose an anti-leftist, anti-Chinese (and by extension anti-Asian) ideology if they want to find a voice that criticizes the COVID-19 regime.
The “leftists” who appear in the media are pro-vaccine and the only opposition to vaccines we see are the followers of Donald Trump. This political configuration makes it possible for the liberals and progressives to dismiss the obvious dangers of vaccines without fear of backlash.
7) Blaming everything on a devious CCP is a sneaky way of avoiding any serious analysis of who owns what in the United States and what the true implications of the concentration of wealth has been for ordinary people.
If citizens knew how these billionaires made their big fortunes, not through innovation and imagination, but by stealing cash from the Federal Reserve that belongs to the citizens of the nation—and creating inflation that punishes citizens, they would be calling for those billionaires to be put in jail.
Blaming things on a vague CCP that is beyond the understanding of citizens helps people to avoid any discussion about who owns what, and how they took it over.
There are examples of corruption and influence peddling involving the Chinese Communist Party. That part of the story is true. But the ultimate goal of the demonization of the CCP is clearly not to reduce foreign influence in Washington D.C. (which is skyrocketing these days) but rather to find a convenient and wrong way of explaining the deep moral corruption in American society.
Kim Woo-gyeong, a lawyer representing the student Hong Ye-young, filed an emergency request to stop mandatory vaccines for third-year high school students in South Korea on July 19 at the Cheongju local court–where the Disease Control and Prevention Agency (DCPA) is located. The request was but part of a legal effort to block the dangerous implementation of the vaccine regime that is supported an association of parents across the country.
Although the request for an emergency halt required a decision from the government within a few days, the response was delayed for over ten days. Moreover, the court notified Kim by phone, days before the hearing, that the DCPA was not prepared to respond to the emergency request and demanded a further delay.
When a hearing was held on August 12, the presiding judge had been inexplicably changed. The new Judge, Kim Seong-soo, summarily dismissed the request without explanation, and brushed off questions concerning the unreasonable delay as a “misunderstanding.” His attitude suggested that his primary role was to block any action.
Lawyer Kim, sensing that due process had reached a dead end, requested the recusal of the judge in light of his bias. The emergency request for a stop of vaccinations went no further, but the larger law suit against the DCPA continues with greater intensity.
The DCPA has become the default government of South Korea over the last year, working together with corrupt elements in the National Intelligence Service and in the corporate world to force-feed the vaccine regime to the Korean people. In most likelihood, the sudden change of the judge was the result of the use of classified directives within DCPA that make it impossible for the government to reveal the nature of internal governance.
After decades of battling for democracy, South Korea has been reduced to a shadow government.
The fight against bio-fascism, and against the vaccine regime in specific, is clearly growing in Korea. Although traditionally Koreans tend to have a high level of trust in the government, as opposed to Americans and Europeans, now that the official numbers of dead as result of vaccines have surpassed 700 (which is just a fraction of the actual number killed) an unspoken unease is creeping into conversations. Whereas friends asked each other whether they had been vaccinated as a new greeting, and donned that cute “I was vaccinated” buttons given out by the government, harsh anti-vaccination postings, and demands for the execution of public officials on the internet are increasing.
You would never guess if you looked at the television news. Half of content is people lining up for vaccines, discussions of the merits of different brands of vaccines, and interviews with happy children who tell us how great they feel after their jabs.
The corporate media, including the “leftist” media sources like Hangyoreh Newspaper and Sisa-In Magazine, have bought into the COVID19 fiction entirely.
It is only right-wing media sources, like the Epoch Times (run by the Falungong cult), that are permitted to report on the dangers of the vaccines in depth. This odd state of affairs does not represent the high quality of journalism at the Epoch Times, a far-right anti-communist journal funded by a handful of rich patrons in Taiwan and elsewhere, but is rather the product of an intentional political game wherein only the most virulent anti-Chinese media is allowed to report on the danger of vaccines so as to make it appear as if the Moon administration is pro-Chinese because it promotes vaccines. The truth is that President Moon is deeply unpopular in China where he is perceived as an American stooge.
The People’s Republic of China is also occupied by globalist, pro-vaccine, forces. But the right-wing narrative that Moon is promoting COVID19 because he is a puppet of China and North Korea is specious, intended to distract attention from how global finance, and not Communists, dominate the Moon administration.
Christian groups have bravely stood up against the vaccine regime. The Christian Daily (Gidok ilbo) ran several important articles critiquing COVID19 policy that were widely read. In addition, the Christian doctor Oh Gyeong-seok, located at the Atlanta University of Health Sciences, has taken the lead in the fight to report on the true dangers of masks and vaccines.
But the Christian opposition to the COVID19 regime also has some wrinkles in it. The willingness of Christians to seek out the truth has been critical, but Christians are being manipulated as a means of drawing attention away from the real players.
For example, the government dispatched officials to churches to block Sunday services and to enforce ridiculous social distancing rules during August COVID19 lockdowns.
These actions were taken at the same time that buses and subways were subject to no restrictions. Yet not a single COVID19 case was reported in the crowded subways or buses.
The bias against churches was obvious. Yet, it made no political sense for the Moon administration to single out churches. Most likely that these actions were forced on Moon by the globalists so that he could be branded as a communist in the media.
The drive to blame everything wrong with COVID19 policy on North Korea and China, rather than multinational corporations, is one of the most popular themes in the conservative media.
Perhaps the most important source for information about the COVID19 scam is “Corona Mystery,” a compact and logically structured book packed with scientific facts. Written by Kim Sang-soo, a doctor practicing traditional Korean homeopathic medicine, “Corona Mystery” is written in an accessible style that made it an underground best seller, especially among young people trying to understand what is going on.
Sadly, many of the high school students who have learned the truth about COVID19 from “Corona Mystery” were nevertheless forced by their parents to take the vaccine. The result has been not only serious health problems, but also despair and suicide.
The Seoul National University professor emeritus Lee Wangjae has given numerous lectures for the public about the misinformation on COVID19.
Korea has a few brave bloggers willing to take this criminal operation by the horns, providing in-depth reports for the public that are otherwise unavailable. Shin Jaeno, under his pen name “Truth Musician ZENO,” offers some of the most creative and inspiring work. Shin gave up his musical career, and his social life, to dedicate his days to writing broadcasts on COVID19 and documenting criminal actions in Korea, and around the world, that have resulted. He translated many videos from English to Korean for a general audience.
Image for Truth Musician Zeno” by artist Kim Kido
Shin wrote several important protest songs against the COVID19 regime that have inspired young people to be politically active. Although his postings on YouTube, Daum, Naver, and elsewhere are deleted as quickly as he gets them up, he never gives up.
Shin joined forces last year with Kim Hyung-nam, a former government official and a lawyer, to establish the Pandemic Investigation Committee (PIC). This organization has been central in advocating for science in the medical field and for opposing the mask and the vaccine mandates.
The Pandemic Investigation Committee organizes Saturday protests in Gwanghwa Gate Plaza, in downtown Seoul, at which a group of loyal members deliver speeches, distribute materials about the true nature of the covid pandemic, put on amusing performances, and confront the police and government officials who are sent to disrupt.
Another regular protestor of the Pandemic Investigation Committee is Ri Nayun, a vocal critic of South Korean political oppression and an advocate for closer ties with North Korea. She has delivered some of the most passionate speeches at the protests, and takes the lead in questioning the legal authority of government officials who try to stop the protests.
Han Seong-young, a former member of the Korean Federation of Trade Unions (an organization that was previously central in leftist politics but that is promoting vaccines today) also plays a critical role in the administration of the Pandemic Investigation Committee.
Another musician deeply involved in the protests is Choe Sung-nyon (known also by his nickname “choeREDi”). Choe spent time in jail for his protests of the election fraud that brought Park Geun-hye to power in 2013. He was also active in the protests against the fraudulent 2020 election that gave the Democratic Party a gross advantage.
Choe had the tenacity to establish a “Khan Communist Party” in violation of the National Security Law and to take on the full power of the corporate state in his political magazine “Mal.” “Mal” (language) was the title of an important intellectual journal that closed down in 2009. Choe uses music and language to carve a new space for expression in a banal modern society.
The Pandemic Investigation Committee shares the same protest space on the Gwanghwa Gate Plaza with right-wing organizations attacking the Moon administration as a communist front and promoting the US-Korea Alliance. Although the leftists in the PIC might be expected to clash with the right-wing protesters, the groups share common ground on the issue of vaccines, and the criminality of the Moon administration, that makes unexpected exchanges possible.
Kim Taepyong, a government official at the provincial court for Chollanamdo Province, led a spirited protest on September 1 in front of the provincial offices in which he held up a banner with a picture of a wolf declaring that the government was lying about vaccines and must stop making fools of the citizens. Mr. Kim explained, “I was a student activist a long time ago and dreamed of creating a better world. When I watched how the lives of citizens running small stores were destroyed by COVID19, I could not stand it any longer. Even it was me alone, I would protest.”
And protest he has, confronting his colleagues with the truth as they walk to work.
Kim Tae-pyong (second from left)
Dr. Kim Sang-soo is the head of MASGOV (Medical Association to Ensure Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations) a group of ethical doctors who have stepped forward to demand an end to the vaccination regime. They issued a declaration on August 15 in which they stated that there was no scientific justification for facemasks, that social distancing policy must be ended immediately, that schools must be reopened and that vaccination policy must be entirely rethought.
Oddly, although Koreans have not organized the massive protests that we see in Europe and the United States. The police in Korea have not used the same level of brutality to suppress protests and to enforce fines for not wearing a mask. If anything, harassment of protesters is less today than it was a few months ago.
Korean politicians on COVID19
The mask, vaccine, and social distancing policies of the central government are fully supported across the board in the National Assembly and in the central government. No political party has drawn into question the policies or the assumptions that lie behind them in the policy debate.
The “progressive” Democratic Party has not only embraced the vaccine regime, it has also publicized the hyped success of its epidemic control policies as its achievement. In a disgusting political move, the recognition in corporate media for the so-called “K Pandemic Control” was presented in Korea as the primary reason why the Democratic Party was so successful in the 2020 election (which was the result of voter fraud).
Most shocking in South Korea is the remarkable loyalty of the “think left; live right” weekend progressive professors, lawyers and mid-level government officials to President Moon Jae-in of the Democratic Party. The blatant totalitarian trends in the government and corporations seem to be invisible to them.
The odd psychology of the progressive class can be understood if we consider the manner in which Moon was installed as president in the first place.
When the conservative President Park Geun-hye was installed as president through voter fraud in 2013, a group of committed intellectuals and government officials threw themselves into a systematic investigation of the manner in which the votes were altered. When this threat to the system reached a peak, and starting to receive coverage in the media, everything was blocked out by reports about the Sewol Ferry sinking. This suspicious sinking, supposedly the result of Park’s incompetence, lead to the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of school children. Although the actual details of the sinking were suppressed, the intention of the reporting was clear: direct attention away from institutional corruption (across party times) that supported fixed elections and focus it on the personality problems of President Park.
For all its flaws, the Park administration tried to assert diplomatic independence—perhaps because Park Geun-hye drew inspiration from the similar efforts of her father Park Chung-hee before he was assassinated in 1979. She spoke of the “bonanza” to be gained from reunification with North Korea and although efforts to expand ties with the North were blocked at every level by the US, she tried to open up a dialogue.
Moreover, her advisors entered into low-key discussions with China that produced an agreement for “comprehensive security cooperation.” That agreement had the potential to make South Korea a player in security policy in East Asia. The Park administration also entered into negotiations with Russia that laid the groundwork for extensive economic integration. These initiatives, often in blatant defiance of Washington’s criticism, demonstrated that Korea was moving towards a new level of political and economic independence.
In the end, Park’s conservative credentials were not enough to protect her when the Washington insiders grew nervous and launched a “color revolution” to take her down and to imprison her.
The next step was the launch of the “candlelight protests” that brought tens of thousands into the streets to criticize Park Geun-hye in a reductive and simplistic campaign that permanently corrupted the souls of Korean progressives. These protests were carefully marketed to give the participants the impression that they were the legacy of the democracy movement of the 1980s. But this protest was much easier, fashioned for upper-middle class progressive-minded people. There was no risk of jail time, no beatings by the police, and no questioning of the fundamental economic and pollical structure of South Korea.
Prepackaged protest signs were supplied to the protesters by corporations close to the Democratic Party, signs that demanded Park’s resignation and denounced her corruption. Few protesters made their own posters and there were no discussions in Seoul between citizens about the nature of political corruption in the country.
The protests were endlessly reported in the commercial media at home and abroad—and praised by mainstream public intellectuals like Francis Fukuyama in the United States. Koreans were convinced that they had come of age as an “advanced nation” and all they had to do be respected and a member of the G7 was to impeach Park.
Fabricated stories about Park engaging in late night orgies at the Blue House and cavorting with shamans were swallowed whole by the progressives, and repeated without any evidence in the mainstream media.
The real give away in that color revolution was the decision of the US embassy in Seoul to turn off the lights on one floor in support for the candlelight protests on December 4, 2016. US embassies have not supported serious democracy moments in the last twenty years.
The corporate media made it clear that the one way forward was for South Korea to elect the Democratic Party candidate Moon Jae-in. Moon was consequently elected in 2017.
When Park Geun-hye was convicted, and sentenced to decades in prison something seemed wrong. When Moon backed just about every trade and security proposal from Washington, and raised the defense budget far beyond anything under Park, the cat was out of the bag.
The broad acceptance of the Candlelight Protests as a legitimate political movement so compromised the moral compass of the progressives that when the blatantly rigged 2020 elections favored the “progressive” Democratic Party and the president who had visited North Korea for peace talks then ordered fascistic COVID19 lockdowns, there was barely a peep.
The Justice Party (Jeonguidang), generally considered to be to the left of the Democratic Party, also embraced the COVID19 story.
Nor did the People’s Power Party (Gukmin ui him), the major conservative opposition party, offer any serious questions about the COVID regime. If anything, the People’s Power Party criticized the Moon administration for not securing enough vaccines quickly.
One exception to the silence was the conversative politician Min Gyeong-uk of People’s Power Party who demanded an investigation of the irregularities in the 2020 election, and criticized the COVID19 lockdowns, suggesting that the whole COVID narrative was a fraud. Min did what no other office holder could, but he did so only in postings on Facebook and in short remarks that had no effect.
Park Geun-hye’s supporters, especially the group Taepyung, went the furthest of all political groups in their criticism of the COVID19 regime. In addition to demanding that Park be reinstated as president and that the 2020 election be overturned, Taepyung demanded that vaccine regime be stopped.
Taepyung went further, but did so why promoting a powerful Korea-US Alliance, the demonization of China, the glorification of the Park Chung-hee regime, and the promotion of Christian values (and close relations with Israel).
South Korea in context
Although South Korea’s response to COVID19 has been disappointing overall, it remains a leader in the organization of systematic protests and legal opposition to totalitarian governance in East Asia.
Although many intellectuals in Asia (and around the world) turned to the Chinese media over the last twenty years because it offered perspectives, and information, not available elsewhere, that appeal has vanished. The Chinese media does not take on the criminality of the COVID19 regime and is better than Western media only in that it reports less about vaccines and social distancing, not because it offers an alternative.
Statements about COVID19 fraud can be found on personal blogs in China, some with a significant following, but they tend to copy articles originally posted elsewhere. I have not found any original reporting on the COVID19 fraud in the Peoples Republic of China.
Vietnam, now completely taken up in a drive to enhance ties with the United States, is completely silent on the issue.
The People’s Democratic Republic of Korea (North Korea) could be seen as the leading nation in the world opposing the COVID19 regime (along with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan). It has unflinchingly maintained that there have been zero cases of COVID19 in North Korea. The ruler of North Korea Kim Jong-un has never worn a mask in public and no vaccine regime has been announced.
But North Korea has not discussed the nature of the conspiracy or tried to expose the medical fraud.
Although the Japanese media has supported social distancing, masks and vaccines without question, many reports have appeared in local media concerning the side effects of vaccines and the possible problems with masks.
The mayor of Izumiotsu, Minamide Kenichi, posted on Youtube (on the city’s official page) on August 10th, an announcement in which he drew attention to serious side effects of COVID19 vaccines and expressed concern. A broadcast on BBS (Sanin Broadcast) posted around the time concerning the side effects of vaccines was deleted without explanation.
A hearing at the National Diet on the side effects of vaccines was held on August 25 by the Health and Science Committee and broadcast to the public. No questions were taken from citizens, however, and only a few comments were made by the experts provided.
The true Korean wave
Although the promotion of the bogus response to COVID19 in Korea as a symbol of Korea’s rise to the status of global leadership was a clear set-up used to flatter the population into accepting dangerous policies, Korea still has the potential to play a role in the response to this massive criminal action.
Although relatively small in number, Korea has intellectuals and citizens who are deeply committed to exposing the crime and they are increasing in number. Moreover, the police and the military have not been mobilized to violently suppress opposition to the degree found in Europe or Australia.
Most importantly, neighboring North Korea has gone the furthest to oppose the COVID regime of any other nation. If the two Koreas can find reconciliation quickly, there may be a road to freedom to be found on the peninsula.
John Brown and his many supporters stood up against the crime of slavery and the corrupt and criminal administrative regime that enabled it in the 1850s. They proposed a provisional constitution that was not meant to be revolutionary, and a “Declaration of Liberty” intended to be an extension of the Declaration of Independence to all Americans.
Although many parts of the two texts are dated, or inappropriate to the current moment, the general import of Brown’s efforts is clearly relevent and provides us with a valuable historical precedent.
It is critical to note that although John Brown was tried and hanged for rebellion, that this argument was specious and fabricated by the criminal slave owners who were afraid that the Constitution might actually be interpreted to follow its original intent and thereby threaten their profits.
The Provisional Constitution, however, is explicit:
These articles not for the overthrow of government.
The foregoing articles shall not be construed so as in any way to encourage the overthrow of any State government, or of the general government of the United States, and look to no dissolution of the Union, but simply to amendment and repeal. And our flag shall be the same that our fathers fought under in the Revolution.
The situation is quite similar to the crisis we face today. Most certainly John Brown is an imperfect model, but he suggests something of what was possible and his work with Frederick Douglass was essential in assuring that the eventual conflict was not a meaningless brawl but had a deeper significance.
“Provisional Constitution and Ordinances for the people of the United States”
“Declaration of Liberty”
“Provisional Constitution and Ordinances for the people of the United States”
Whereas slavery, throughout its entire existence in the United States, is none other than a most barbarous, unprovoked, and unjustifiable war of one portion of its citizens upon another portion-the only conditions ‘of which are perpetual imprisonment and hopeless servitude or absolute extermination-in utter disregard and violation of those eternal and self-evident truths set forth in our Declaration of Independence:
Therefore, we, citizens of the United States, and the oppressed people who, by a recent decision of the Supreme’ Court, are declared to have no rights which the white man is bound to respect, together with all other people degraded by the laws thereof, do, for the time being, ordain and establish for ourselves the following Provisional Constitution and Ordinances, the better to protect our persons, property, lives, and liberties, and to govern our actions
Qualifications for membership
All persons of mature age, whether proscribed, oppressed, and enslaved citizens, or of the proscribed and oppressed races of the United States, who shall agree to sustain and enforce the Provisional Constitution and Ordinances of this organization, together with all minor children of such persons, shall be held to be fully entitled to protection under the same.
Branches of government.
The provisional government of this organization shall consist of three branches, viz: legislative, executive, and judicial.
The legislative branch shall be a Congress or House of Representative, composed of not less than five nor more than ten members, who shall be elected by all citizens of mature age and of sound mind connected with this organization, and who shall remain in office for three years, unless sooner removed for misconduct, inability, or by death. A majority of such members shall constitute a quorum.
The executive branch of this organization shall consist of a President and Vice-President, who shall be chosen by the citizens or members of this organization, and each of whom shall hold his office for three years” unless sooner removed by death or for inability or misconduct.
The judicial branch of this organization shall consist of one Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and of four associate judges of said court, each constituting a circuit court. They shall each be chosen in the same manner as the President, and shall continue in office until their places have been filled in the same manner by election of the citizens. Said court shall have jurisdiction in all civil or criminal causes arising under this constitution, except breaches of the rules of war.
Validity of enactments.
All enactments of the legislative branch shall, to become valid during the first three years, have the approbation of the President and of the Commander-in-chief of the army.
A Commander-in-chief of the army shall be chosen by the President, Vice-President, a majority of the Provisional Congress, and of the Supreme Court, and he shall receive his commission from the President, signed by the Vice-President, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Secretary of War, and he shall hold his office for three years, unless removed by death or on proof of incapacity or misbehavior. He shall, unless under arrest, (and until his place is actually filled as provided for by this constitution,) direct all movements of the army and advise with any allies. He shall, however, be tried, removed, or punished, on complaint of the President, by at least three general officers, or a majority of the House of Representatives, or of the Supreme Court; which House of Representatives, (the President presiding,) the Vice-President, and the members of the Supreme Court, shall constitute a court-martial for his trial; with power to remove or punish, as the case may require, and to fill his place, as above provided.
A Treasurer, Secretary of State, Secretary of War, and Secretary of the Treasury, shall each be chosen, for the first three years, in the same way and manner as the Commander-in-chief, subject to trial or removal on complaint of the President, Vice-President, or Commander in-chief, to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, or on complaint of the majority of the members of said court or the Provisional Congress. The Supreme Court shall have power to try or punish either of those officers, and their places shall be filled as before.
Secretary of War.
The Secretary of War shall be under the immediate direction of the Commander-in-chief, who may temporarily fill his place in case of arrest or of any inability to serve.
Congress or House of Representatives.
The House of Representatives shall make ordinances providing for the appointment (by the President or otherwise) of all civil officers, excepting those already named; and shall have power to. make all laws and ordinances for the general good, not inconsistent with this Constitution and these ordinances.
Appropriation of money
The Provisional Congress shall have power to appropriate money or other property actually in the hands of the treasurer, to any object calculated to promote the general good, so far as may be consistent with the provisions of this constitution; and may, in certain cases, appropriate for a moderate compensation of agents, or persons not members of this organization, for any important service they are known to have rendered.
It shall be the duty of Congress to provide for the instant removal of any civil officer or policeman, who becomes habitually intoxicated, or who is addicted to other immoral conduct, or to any neglect or unfaithfulness in the discharge of his official duties. Congress shall also be a Standing Committee of Safety, for the purpose of obtaining important information; and shall be in constant communication with the Commander-in-chief; the members of which shall each, as also the President, Vice-President, members of the Supreme Court, and Secretary of State, have full power to issue warrants, returnable as Congress shall ordain (naming witnesses, &c.,) upon their own information, without the formality of a complaint. Complaint shall be immediately made after arrest, and before trial; the party arrested to be served with a copy at once.
Trial of President and other Officers
The President and Vice-President may either of them be tried, removed, or punished, on complaint made to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, by a majority of the House of Representatives; which house together with the Associate Judges of the Supreme Court, the whole to be presided over by the Chief Justice in case of the trial of the Vice-President, shall have full power to try such officers, to remove or punish as the case may require, and to fill any vacancy so occurring, the same as in the case of the Commander-in-chief.
Trial of members of Congress.
The members of the House of Representatives may, any and all of them, be tried, and, on conviction, removed or punished, on complaint before the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, made by any number of the members of said house exceeding one-third; which house, with the Vice-President and Associate Judges of the Supreme Court, shall constitute the proper tribunal with power to fill such vacancies.
Impeachment of Judges.
Any member of the Supreme Court may also be impeached, tried, convicted, or punished by removal or otherwise, Oil complaint to the President, who shall in such case, preside; the Vice-President, House of Representatives, and other members of the Supreme Court, constituting the proper tribunal, (with power to fill vacancies,) on complaint of a majority of said House of Representatives, or of the Supreme Court; a majority of the whole having power to decide.
Duties of President and Secretary of State.
The President, with the Secretary of State; shall, immediately upon entering on the duties of their office, give special attention to secure from amongst their own people, men of integrity, intelligence, and good business habits and capacity, and, above an, of first-rate moral and religious character and influence, to act as civil officers of every description and grade, as well as teachers, chaplains, physicians, surgeons, mechanics, agents of every description, clerks, and messengers. They shall make special efforts to induce, at the earliest possible period, persons and families of that description to locate themselves within the limits secured by this organization; and shall, moreover, from time to time, supply the names and residence of such persons to the Congress, for their special notice and information, as among the most important of their duties; and the President is herebyauth9rized and empowered to afford special aid to such individuals, from such moderate appropriations as the Congress shall be able and may deem advisable to make for that object. The President and Secretary of State, and in all cases of disagreement the Vice-President, shall appoint all civil officers, but shall not have power to remove any officer. All removals shall be the result of a fair trial, whether civil or military.
It shall be the duty of the President and Secretary of State to find out (as soon as possible) the real friends as well as enemies of this organization in every part of the country; to secure among them innkeepers, private postmasters, private mail contractors, messengers, and agents, through whom may be obtained correct and regular information constantly; recruits for the service, places of deposit and sale, together with all needed supplies; and it shall be matter of special regard to secure such facilities through the northern States.
Duty of the President.
It shall be the duty of the President, as well as the House of Representatives, at all times, to inform the Commander-in-chief of any matter that may require his attention, or that may affect the public safety.
Duty of President, continued.
It shall be the duty of the President to see that the provisional ordinances of this organization, and those made by the Congress, are promptly and faithfully executed; and he may, in cases of great urgency, call on the Commander-in-chief of the army or other officers for aid; it being, however, intended that a sufficient civil police shall always be in readiness to secure implicit obedience to law.
The Vice-President shall be the presiding officer of the Provisional Congress, and in cases of tie shall give the casting vote.
In case of the death, removal, or inability of the President, the Vice President, and, next to him, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall be the President during the remainder of the term; and the place of the Chief Justice, thus made vacant, shall be filled by Congress from’ some of the members of said court; and the places of the Vice-President and Associate Justice, thus made vacant, filled by an election by the united action of the Provisional Congress and members of the Supreme Court. All other vacancies, not heretofore specially provided for, shall, during the first three years, be filled by the united action of the President, Vice-President, Supreme Court, and Commander-in-chief of the army.
Punishment of crimes.
The punishment of crimes not capital, except in case of insubordinate convicts or other prisoners, shall be (so far as may be) by hard labor on the public works, roads, &c.
It shall be the duty of all commissioned officers of the army to name candidates of merit, for office or elevation, to the Commander-in-chief, who, with the Secretary of War, and, in. cases of disagreement, the President, shall be the appointing power of the army; and all commissions of military officers shall bear the signatures of the Commander in-chief and the Secretary of War. And it shall be the special duty of the Secretary of War to keep for constant reference of the Commander-in-chief a full list of names of persons nominated for office or elevation by the officers of the army, with the name and rank of the officer nominating, stating distinctly, but briefly, the grounds for such notice or nomination. The Commander-in-chief shall not have power to remove or punish any officer or soldier, but he may order their arrest and trial at any time by court-martial.
Courts-martial for companies, regiments, brigades, &c., shall be called by the chief officer of each command, on complaint to him by any officer, or any five privates in such command, and shall consist of not less than five nor more than nine officers, non-commissioned officers and privates, one half of whom shall not be lower in rank than the person on trial, to be chosen by the three highest officers in the command, which officers shall not be a part of such court. The chief officer of any command shall, of course, be tried by a court-martial of the command above his own. All decisions affecting the lives of persons, or office of persons holding commission, must, before taking full effect, have the signature of the Commander-in-chief, who may also, on the recommendation of at least one third of the members of the court-martial finding any sentence, grant a reprieve or commutation of the same.
No person connected with this organization shall be entitled to any salary, pay, or emolument, other than a competent support of himself and family, unless it be from an equal dividend made of public property, on the establishment of peace, or of special provision by treaty; which provision shall be made for all persons who may have been in any active civil or military service at any time previous to any hostile action for liberty and equality.
Treaties of peace.
Before any treaty of peace shall take full effect it shall be signed by the President and Vice-President, the Commander-in-chief, a majority of the House of Representatives, a majority of the Supreme Court, and a majority of all the general officers of the army.
Duty of the military.
It shall be the duty of the Commander-in-chief and all officers and soldiers of the army to afford special protection, when needed, to Congress or any member thereof, to the Supreme Court or any member thereof, to the President, Vice-President, Treasurer, Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, and Secretary of War; and to afford general protection to all civil officers or other persons having right to the same.
All captured or confiscated property and all property the product of the labor of those belonging to this organization and of their families, shall. be held as the property of the whole, equally, without distinction, and may be used for the common benefit, or disposed of for the same object; and any person, officer, or otherwise, who shall improperly retain, secrete, use, or needlessly destroy such property, or property found, captured, or confiscated, belonging to the enemy, or shall willfully neglect to render a full and fair statement of such property by him so taken or held, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be punished accordingly.
Safety or intelligence fund.
All money, plate, watches, or jewelry captured by honorable warfare, found, taken, or confiscated, belonging to the enemy, shall be held sacred to constitute a liberal safety or intelligence fund; and any person who shall improperly retain, dispose of, hide, use, or destroy such money or other article above named, contrary to the provisions and spirit of this article, shall be deemed guilty of theft, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished accordingly. The treasurer shall furnish the Commander-in-chief at all times with a full statement of the condition of such fund, and its nature.
The Commander-in-chief and the treasury.
The Commander-in-chief shall have power to draw from the treasury the money and other property of the fund provided for in article twenty-ninth; but his orders shall be signed also by the Secretary of War, who shall keep strict account of the same subject to examination by any member of Congress or general officer.
Surplus of the safety or intelligence fund.
It shall be the duty of the Commander-in-chief to advice the President of any surplus of the safety and intelligence fund, who shall have power to draw such surplus (his order being also signed by the Secretary of State) to enable him to carry out the provisions of article seventeenth.
No person, after having surrendered himself or herself a prisoner, and who shall properly demean himself or herself as such, to any officer or private connected with this organization, shall afterward be put to death, or be subject to any corporeal punishment, without first having had the benefit of a fair and impartial trial; nor shall any prisoner be treated with any kind of cruelty, disrespect, insult, or needless severity; but it shall be the duty of all persons, male and female, connected herewith, at all times and under all circumstances, to treat all such prisoners with every degree of respect and kindness that the nature of the circumstances will admit of, and to insist on a like course of conduct from all others, as in the fear of Almighty God, to whose care and keeping we commit our cause.
All persons who may come forward, and shall voluntarily deliver up their slaves, and have their names registered on the books of the organization, shall, so long as they continue at peace, be entitled to the fullest protection of person and property, though not connected with this organization, and shall be treated as friends and not merely as persons neutral.
The persons and property of all non-slaveholders, who shall remain absolutely neutral, shall be respected so far as the circumstances can allow of it, but they shall not be entitled to any active protection.
No needless waste.
The needless waste or destruction of any useful property or article by fire, throwing open of fences, fields, buildings, or needless killing of animals, or injury of either, shall not be tolerated at any time or place, but shall be promptly and properly punished.
The entire personal and real property of all persons known to be acting either directly or indirectly with or for the enemy, or Found in arms with them, or found willfully holding slaves, shall be confiscated and taken whenever and wherever it may be found in either free or slave States.
Persons convicted on impartial trial of desertion to the enemy, after becoming members, acting as spies, or of treacherous surrender of property, ammunition, provisions, or supplies of any kind, roads, bridges, persons, or fortifications shall be put to death, and their entire property confiscated.
Violation of parole of honor.
Persons proven to be guilty of taking up arms after having been set at liberty on parole of honor, or, after the same, to have taken any active part with or for the enemy, direct or indirect, shall be put to death, and their entire property confiscated.
All must labor.
All persons connected in any way with this organization, and who may be entitled to full protection under it, shall be held as under obligation to labor in some way for the general good; and persons refusing or neglecting so to do, shall, on conviction, receive a suitable and appropriate punishment.
Profane swearing, filthy conversation, indecent behavior, or indecent exposure of the person, or intoxication or quarreling, shall not be allowed or tolerated, neither unlawful intercourse of the sexes.
Persons convicted of the forcible violation of any female prisoner shall be put to death.
The marriage relation, schools, the Sabbath.
The marriage relation shall be at all times respected, and families kept together, as far as possible; and broken families encouraged to reunite, and intelligence offices established for that purpose. Schools and churches established, as soon as may be, for the purpose of religious and other instructions; for the first day of the week, regarded as a day of rest, and appropriated to moral and religious instruction and improvement, relief of the suffering, instruction of the young and ignorant, and the encouragement of personal cleanliness; nor shall any persons be required on that day to perform ordinary manual labor, unless in extremely urgent cases.
Carry arms openly.
All persons known to be of good character and of sound mind and suitable age, who are connected with this organization, whether male or female, shall be encouraged to carry arms openly.
No person to carry concealed weapons.
No person within the limits of the conquered territory, except regularly appointed policemen, express officers of the army, mail carriers, or other fully accredited messengers of the Congress, President, Vice President, members of the Supreme Court, or commissioned officers of the army-and those only under peculiar circumstances-shall be allowed at any time to carry concealed weapons; and any person not specially authorized so to do, who shall be found so doing, shall be deemed a suspicious person, and may at once be arrested by any officer, soldier, or citizen, without the formality of a complaint or warrant, and may at once be subjected to thorough search, and shall have his or her case thoroughly investigated, and be dealt with as circumstances on proof shall require.
Persons to be seized.
Persons within the limits of the territory holden by this organization, not connected with this organization, having arms at all, concealed or otherwise, shall be seized at once, or, be taken in charge of some vigilant officer, and their case thoroughly investigated; and it shall be the duty of all citizens and soldiers, as well as officers, to arrest such parties as are named in this and the preceding section or article, without the formality of complaint or warrant; and they shall be placed in charge of some proper officer for examination or for safekeeping.
These articles not for the overthrow of government.
The foregoing articles shall not be construed so as in any way to encourage the overthrow of any State government, or of the general government of the United States, and look to no dissolution of the Union, but simply to amendment and repeal. And our flag shall be the same that our fathers fought under in the Revolution.
No plurality of offices.
No two of the offices specially provided for by this instrument shall be filled by the same person at the same time.
Every officer, civil or military, connected with this organization shall, before entering upon the duties of his office, make solemn oath or affirmation to abide by and support this provisional constitution and these ordinances; also every citizen and soldier, before being fully recognized as such, shall do the same.
The president of this convention shall convene, immediately on the adoption of this instrument, a convention of all such persons as shall have given their adherence by signature to the constitution, who shall proceed to fill, by election, all offices specially named in said constitution, the president of this convention presiding, and issuing commissions to such officers elect; all such officers being thereafter elected in the manner provided in the body of this instrument.
“A Declaration of Liberty”
By the Representatives of the slave Population of the United States of America
“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary” for an Oppressed People to Rise, and assert their Natural Rights, as Human Beings, as Native & mutual Citizens of a free Republic, and break that odious Yoke of oppression, which is so unjustly laid upon them by their fellow Countrymen, “and to assume among the powers of Earth the same equal privileges to which the Laws of Nature, & natures God entitle them; A moderate respect for the opinions of Mankind, requires that they should declare the causes which incite them to this just & worthy action.
We hold these truths to be Self Evident; That All Men are Created Equal; That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. That among these are Life, Liberty; & the pursuit of happiness. That Nature hath freely given to all Men, a full Supply of Air. Water, & Land; for their sustenance, & mutual happiness, That No Man has any right to deprive his fellow Man, of these Inherent rights, except in punishment of Crime. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That when any form of Government, becomes destructive to these ends, It is the right of the People, to alter, Amend, or Remodel it, Laying its foundation on Such Principles, & organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect the safety, & happiness” of the Human Race, To secure equal rights, privileges, & justice to all; Irrespective of Sex; or Nation; To Secure Fraternal Kindness to all Friends of Equal Moral privileges, to all who honestly abandon their Despotic oppressive rule. We hold this truth to be self-evident; That it is the highest Privilege, & Plain Duty of Man; to strive in every reasonable way, to promote the Happiness, Mental, Moral, & Physical,
Elevation of his fellow Man. And that People, or Clannish Oppressors; who wickedly violate this sacred principle; oppressing th their fellow Men, Will bring upon themselves that certain & fearful retribution, which is the Natural, and Necessary penalty of evil Doing. “Prudence, indeed will dictate, that Governments long established, should not be changed for light & transient causes; But when a long train of abuses, & usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object; evinces a design to perpetuate an absolute Despotism; and most cruel bondage; It is their Right, it is their Duty to resist & change such Government, & provide safeguards for their future Liberty” Such has been the patient sufferance of the slaves of the United States, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to brush this foul system of oppression, The history of Slavery in the Unites States, is a history of injustice & Cruelties inflicted upon the Slave in every conceivable way, & in barbarity not surpassed by the most Savage Tribes. It is the embodiment of all that is Evil, and ruinous to a Nation; and subversive of all Good. “In proof of which; facts innumerable have been submitted to the People, and have received the Verdict & condemnation of a candid & Impartial World.”
Our Servants; Members of Congress; & other Servants of the People, who receive exorbitant wages, from the People ask in return for; for their unjust Rule, have refused to pass Laws the most wholesome & necessary for public good, they have refused to pass laws for the accommodation of large districts of People, unless that People, would relinquish the right of representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them, and formidable to tyrants only. Our President & other Leeches have called together Legislative, or treasonable Bodies, at places unusual, uncomfortable, & distant from the depository of our public records; for the sole purpose of fatiguing us into compliance with their measures. They have dissolved Representative houses, for opposing with Manly firmness, their invasions on the rights of the people.
They have refused to grant Petitions presented by numerous & respectable Citizens, asking redress of grievances imposed upon us, demanding our Liberty & natural rights. With Contempt, they Spurn and our humble petitions; and have failed to pass Laws for our relief. They have prevented in all possible ways, the administration of justice to the slave, They have made judges Taney dependent on their will alone, for the tenure of their offices, & the amount & payment of their salaries, They have erected a Multitude of new offices, & sent on swarms of Blood Suckers, & Moths, to harass the People, & eat out their substance, They have effected to render the Military, independent of, & superior to the power & wishes of the People (the Civil power.) Claiming that knowledge is power, they have, (for their own safety) kept us in total darkness, & Ignorance, inflicting base cruelties, for any attempt on our part to obtain knowledge “They have protected base Men, Pirates (engaged in a most Inhuman traffic; The Foreign; & Domestic, Slave Trade.) by mock trials, from punishment, for unprovoked murders which they have committed upon us, & free citizens of the States.
They have prevented by law, our having any Traffic or deal with our fellow Men; Regardless of our wishes, they declare themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. They have abdicated government among us, by declaring us out of their protection, & waging a worse than most cruel war upon us continually.
“The welfare of the People; Is the first Great Law.” The fact, & a full description of the enormous Sin of Slavery, may be found in the General History of American Slavery, which is a history of repeated injuries, of base hypocrisy; A cursed treasonable, Despotic usurpation; The most abominable provoking atrocities; Which are but a mockery of all that is just, or worthy of any people. Such cruelty, tyranny, & perfidy, has hardly a parallel, in the history of the most barbarous ages, Our Servants, or Law makers; are totally unworthy the name of Half Civilized Men. All their National acts, (which apply to Slavery,) are false, to the words spirit, & intention, of the Constitution of the United States, & the Declaration of Independence. They say by word & Act, That their own Children, or any faithful Citizen, may be legally robed of every Natural & Sacred Right, & that we, have no rights whatever.
They are a Blot upon the Character, the honor, of any Nation, which Claims to have the least shadow or spark of Civilization above the lowest, most inferior Cannibal Races. This is a slight though brief recital, of some of the enormous atrocities, of these Idle, haughty, tyrannical, Arrogant Land Monopolists; Slave holders our lords, & masters, From which, Good Lord Deliver us. These are some of the facts, which we now, (after the lapse of 83 years, since the writing & signing of that Sacred Instrument, Honored & Adored by our Fathers, which declares that it is Self-Evident that all Men are Created Equal, Endowed by their Creator with certain inherent rights &c”) submit to the Decision of all candid; true Republican, Friends of Universal Freedom, & Natural Equality of Rights. All We Demand; is our Liberty, & the Natural rights & immunities of faithful Citizens of the United States.
We will Obtain these rights or Die in the struggle to obtain them We make war upon oppression, we have no controversy with any Religious Sect, Our intention is not to molest any Good Man, whatever may be his religious belief.
We hold these to be self-evident truths, That any Tribe, Rulers, or People, who Rob & cruelly oppress their faithful Laboring Citizens, have within themselves the Germ, of their own certain & fearful overthrow; It is one of Nature’s Immutable Laws; that “According to the measure ye mite; so shall it be Measured to you again.” Herein is the secret of security & true happiness, for Individuals, And the Only Firm Basis, upon which Governments, may be p Permanently Established; Where the Citizens, are Devoted to the greatest good of their Fellow Men, The more humble, benighted & oppressed they are, so much the more sympathy; & earnest effort for their relief, is demanded, striving earnestly to promote the safety and prosperity of their Nation; & the Human Race.
It is a fixed Law of Nature, That any People, or Nation, whose [sturdy?] purpose, & Constant Practice, is in accordance with these principles; Must go forward Progressing; So long as Man Continues to Exist. For in Nature the Principle of Reciprocity is Great.
“The Legitimate object of all Punishment, is to prevent Crime” When any Punishment is inflicted, more than is necessary to prevent crime, it then ceases to be a Punishment. It has become a Barbarous Crime. A Sore Evil. “The Natural Object of all Government is to Protect the right, Defend the Innocent.” When any set of Usurpers, Tribe, or Community, fail to protect the right, but furnish protection & encouragement to the Villain, by bestowing a Bounty, or Premium, upon the vile Thief, Robber , Libertine, Pirate; & Woman killing Slave Holder; as a reward, for their deeds of rascality and Barbarism; And inflict grievous cruelties upon the innocent, Shooting & Butchering those most faithful, Citizens, who have Striven Manfully, for the relief of the downtrodden &; oppressed of their Country), who fought bravely in support of the Great Principles set forth in D our Declaration of Independence, from the oppressive Rule of England.) Encouraging in various ways, by bribery & fraud, the most Fiendish acts of Barbarism (like those Perpetrated within the limits of the United States, in Florida, at Blounts Fort; in Florida & in other Territories.) under the Jurisdiction & guidance of Slaveholding Authority, & in strict accordance with Slaveholding Rules).
They have transcended their own limits, They have fairly outwitted themselves; Their Slave Code, is a shame to any Nation, Their Laws, are no Laws; they themselves are no more than a Band compilation of Base Piratical Rulers. They are a curse to themselves, a most lamentable Blot upon Society.
“In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress, in the most humble terms, Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injuries, A Class of oppressors, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrannical Despotism, is unfit to rule any People. Nor have we been wanting in attention, to our Oppressors; we have warned them from time to time, of attempts (made by their headlong Blindness,) to perpetuate, extend, strengthen, & revive the dying elements of this cursed Institution. We have reminded them of our unhappy condition, and of their cruelties. We have appealed to their native justice & magnanimity, to we have conjured them by the ties of our common nature, our Brotherhood, & Common Parentage, to disavow these usurpations, which have destroyed our Kindred friendship, and endangered their safety.
“They have been Deaf to the voice of Justice & Consanguinity. We must therefore acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces their tyranny & unjust rule over us. Declaring that we will serve them no longer as slaves, Knowing that the Laborer is worthy of his hire.” We therefore, the Representatives of the Circumscribed Citizens of the United States, of America in General Congress Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World, for the rectitude of our intentions, Do in the name, & by the authority.
The massive concentration of wealth over the last few years has made it possible for a tiny handful of individuals to control the means of extraction, production, and distribution, the sales of food and products, and the value of money. They are free to demand at will the statements they need to justify totalitarian rule, customized to the tastes of specific communities, from their pet experts at Harvard University, at the World Health Organization, at the New York Times or Counterpunch, at the National Review or the World Socialist Web Page, and in government of the United States, and of most other countries.
The rate at which wealth has been concentrated is unprecedented in human history, in part because of the exponential evolution of technology that permits a global manipulation of currency and other financial products in a complex manner beyond the capacity of most to comprehend.
New AI technology allows for the promotion of false information globally through the commercial media in a confusing manner. The super-rich use this confusion to divide and to confuse the citizens of the United States, and of the world, presenting contradictory opinions through the authority figures that they promote, often opinions that lack any scientific basis.
Understanding why so many highly-educated Americans are incapable of responding to the current crisis, and endorse a vaccine regime that they do not believe in, requires us to look at the larger strategy for manipulating choices offered to establishment intellectuals. In part, it is a matter of lag time. Intellectuals are shocked by the rapid shifts in geopolitics. They find it easier to wallow in self-pity, or to bury their heads in denial. The period of time required for a new generation of committed intellectuals to emerge is not fast enough to keep up with the rate of change—and thus have failed to organize anti-fascist movements like those of the 1930s that formed the kernel of true resistance to totalitarianism.
It is helpful to focus on a few of the false choices, the baited gambits, that have been skillfully set up by the advisors to the super-rich so as to create fissures in American society that fragment the establishment, and create internal conflicts in a predetermined manner, so that no broad consensus is reached and citizens unknowingly do the dirty work for the super-rich.
Let us consider the central baited gambits being utilized today.
The New Cold War
The commercial media is pumping out a uniform story about a New Cold War between the United States and China that has been reformatted in different political flavors for distribution on hundreds of media platforms. There are conservative and progressive flavors to this story about unprecedented tensions between China and the United States born of Chinese expansionism.
Not everything about Chinese actions in Xinjiang, or in Hong Kong, is false, but for the most part the tale is so grotesquely distorted that we might as well file it under fiction in our library.
I have not found any serious discussions about how this New Cold War is being promoted by media interests whose stock is owned by the same concerns who want to make a fortune from the massive increase in the US military budget that resulted from the Defense Appropriations Bill of 2020. Nor does anyone mention the process by which multinational banks and corporate interests have encouraged national conflicts over territory and ethnic identity so as to push for militarization in the years before the First World War, or how that cynical ploy was related to overcapacity and overproduction and how the alchemy of wartime demand was used to make liability into a godsend. French, British and German banks were happy to play footsie in that tragicomedy and the hidden profiteering continued even after the war began.
It would not take more than a few minutes of comparison between the tricks used by global finance leaders in London, Paris and Berlin in 1914, and the similar tricks being employed by US and Chinese financial interests today, for citizens to get the idea.
In place of analysis, we are force-fed the tired and trite tale of the “Thucydides trap” endlessly promoted by the highest-paid minion of the investment bankers, the made-to-order prophet lauded and feted by CEOs in New York and Shanghai, Harvard’s own éminence grise Graham Ellison.
If we want to understand what is taking place in the unhealthy “Frankenstein Alliance,” in the death pact signed between elites in Washington and Beijing, we must first break out of this foolish “nation state” schemata peddled to intellectuals by global bankers and look directly at the massive collaboration between the super-rich globally for the purpose of destroying the lives of workers, and unfold and unravel their schemes to play American workers against Chinese workers so as to stop any unity of purpose on the part of citizens.
Graham Ellison and his Harvard friends are never going to talk about how Harvard’s de facto majority shareholder Goldman Sachs plans to use economic conflict between the United States and China as a means to push through the complete automation of factories and the massive implementation of AI in both countries in the name of “competition.”
The battle is not so much between Beijing and Washington, although that battle is also plenty real, but more about the drive of global finance to control the assets, the money, the activities, the identity, and the bodies of every single worker in both countries. What cannot be forced through in China, will be forced through in the United States first, or vise versa—or in another country first.
Maybe Elon Musk and Jack Ma are not voices of reason crying out against a nationalistic narrow-minded national agenda in the United States and China, but partners in a scheme to monopolize the resources and the assets of the entire world.
That process, even though it can be documented without too much effort using open-source materials, must be dismissed as a conspiracy theory beyond the pale. The only accurate means to understand the conflicts between China and the United States today, we are told by the authorities, is through an analogy to a war between Sparta and Athens in the fifth century B.C.
The possibility that neither China nor America exist today as political units in light of the radical concentration of wealth is the most likely explanation for what we witness today. You will not read that analysis anywhere.
What are the immediate results of the increase in defense spending for this “New Cold War?”
The opportunity to increase massively defense spending in the United States, China, and throughout East Asia—and now throughout the world–has the banks drooling. Many financial interests stand to benefit from all that spending, that artificially created demand. Citizens are force-fed cold war fiction without a word about who makes the money from weapon systems globally—including in China.
The spending, in the US Department of Defense, or the intelligence community, is no longer aimed at training people in Chinese, or developing a new generation of people who understand the politics and cultures of the nations of Asia. Increasingly, those who studied in China (to learn Chinese) cannot get the security clearances required to work in government.
Most of that money is tagged for ridiculously overpriced fighter planes, tanks, anti-missile systems, and satellites that, in many cases, already have been shown to be ineffective, or useless.
Those at the working-level in the military and intelligence are still trying to do their jobs in spite of the increasingly absurd orders that they receive. To some degree they can convince themselves that the reports of threats from Chinese AI, drones and robots are credible. Certainly the round-the-clock work schedule that is forced on them (similar to what was done before the Iraq invasion) makes it nearly impossible to concentrate.
What no one is going to tell citizens, or even personnel with top secret/SCI clearance, is that the AI being developed is meant to be a weapon to degrade the ability of citizens to think (starting with military personnel) through destructive stimulation of the brain using commercial media, and to divide and confuse the populations of both nations, using different time frames and agendas, so as to soften up the citizens of the Earth for the absolute rule of the super-rich.
Will the next generation micro drones and robots, energy weapons on low-orbit satellites, be used in some glorious Normandy Landing, or Athens-Sparta conflict between civilizations and nation states? Or might the final intention be to employ these weapons so as to attack the citizens of China and of the United States, if they try to resist this global power grab?
The war has already been declared. Both China and the United States, and many other countries, have become the battle ground in the drive to completely corrupt science, and to make all sources of information spigots for propaganda in support of bio-fascist regimes like COVID19.
Whether in Dallas or Wuhan, Osaka or Dresden, AI logarithms are being used now to shut down civil society, and stacks of drones and robots that can attack whoever they are programmed to attack, are waiting in the wings.
It is worth noting that the New York Times have taken a sudden interest in police violence over the last year after completely ignoring the issue for decades. Moreover, they are not interested in systemic corruption, but rather in gaudy incidents which are played up in the news cycle just long enough to create a consensus for a policy shift.
Perhaps the goal is not to reduce police violence, but rather to undermine public confidence in police officers as a means of defunding the human police. But, is the intention of such a move to create a more human police force with closer ties to the community? Or might this rather be the first stage in softening up the public to accept the replacement of human police with drones and robots that may have smiles on their faces but are capable of a ruthlessness beyond any human?
Your choice: Climate Change or COVID19?
Multinational investment banks, corporations, and the super-rich that control them, have paid their operators to set up a false choices for citizens that are meant to divide us and to discourage organized resistance. Prefabricated liberal-conservative conflicts are core to this effort. Although this effort has gone on for decades, the classified programs to engineer conflicts based on ethnicity, culture or gender, has gone into warp drive as the blatant power grab of the elite becomes increasingly obvious.
Central among the baited gambits offered up is the false choice between addressing climate change and acknowledging that COVID19 is a massive fraud. Anyone who tries to take on both issues at once will find that he or she cannot get anything published anywhere. Everyone is given a choice or choosing one, or the other, or disappearing from public discourse altogether. For the ego-driven “public intellectuals” so accustomed to seeing their precious names in print, the compromise is of little significance.
You can either recognize that the climate is adversely impacted by emissions, the destruction of the ecosystem and by an economy driven by a dangerous model of “growth” and “consumption” or you can argue that COVID19 has no scientific basis and that the forced-vaccine regime is an attempt by rich and powerful to take control of our bodies and to deny us the right to work, to go to school, or to seek medical treatment for random reasons.
One the one side, we see progressive-flavored intellectuals like Noam Chomsky or Chris Hedges talking about the danger of fossil fossil fuels and the ignorance of science displayed by Republicans in the pay of the oil companies. Some parts of their arguments are true. Other are tailored to the needs of investment banks. For example, they are happy to push for solar power and wind power, but they do not mention that these renewable energy projects are planned and pushed through by corporate banks. Nor do these intellectuals describe how citizens produced their own renewable energy before John Rockefeller forced them to become dependent on big oil.
These progressives also leave Bill Gates book “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster” alone, preferring to give the Gates Foundation all the slack it needs to use the “climate crisis” to tighten political and ideological control.
In the other corner we find those, often associated with Donald Trump or Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who stand united in their condemnation of the COVID19 “plandemic,” the mask mandate and the vaccine regime. These forces have developed increasingly sophisticated media sources and they support their critiques with substantial scientific data. For the most part, these groups are dismissed out of hand by the Nation or Greenpeace as extremists, or anti-science, when they speak the truth.
As good as the science for these groups may be regarding COVID19 (and it is not always accurate) they are silent on, or even dismissive of, the threats of climate change, the collapse of biodiversity, the destruction of the environment by fracking and micro-plastics. They are willing to stand up to Bill Gates and George Soros, but get wobbly knees when it comes to BP and Exxon.
Another part of this scheme to drive a stake through science in the United States establishment is the engineered split in interpretive communities concerning the 9.11 incident: a powerful shibboleth in American politics. This obvious fraud, which defies the principles taught in high school physics, is a taboo for the progressive groups standing up in self-righteous indignation over climate change, social injustice and systemic racism.
9.11 is not taboo, however, for conservative groups posting at QAnon or the X22 Report. But there is a catch. Many of the scientific discussions of 9/11, or of COVID19, are narrated with reference to Christian philosophy concerning the nature of evil, and are supported with references to the Book of Revelations. Although such references may be valid, they inherently limit the appeal of these reports for the public.
These postings tend to focus on figures like George Soros or Hillary Clinton who are tied to the “leftists” in a simplistic manner. The critiques in these reports lack a systematic analysis of the interlocking financial interests around the world that were behind that incident. These conservative news sources lack the systematic analysis of who owns what found in books like Giants: The Global Power Elite (Peter Phillips).
The focus on the trafficking of youth for pedophiles by high-ranking political figures (such as Bill Clinton and Barack Obama) and their alleged participation in Satanic practices, also limits the impact of these conservative reports. There is plenty of evidence of pedophilia among power players in Washington D.C., and there exists documentation that such incidents have been purposely set up to collect damaging information about politicians. But this political practice is but one of a variety of methods for buying and intimating, and not as central as these reports suggest.
It is possible that high ranking politicians engaged in Satanic rituals as well, but from what I have seen of the exercise of power in Washington D.C. its seems rather unlikely that Satanic practices are that prominent. I suspect that although there may be some truth to those claims, that stressing Satanism is a condition for getting the word out because it limits the audience. Perhaps secret law not only blocks reporting on COVID19 in the mainstream media, but also requires that those who are allowed to report on the topic introduce a heavy dose of Christian ideology that cuts down on circulation among progressive groups.
The Conspiracy Theory trap
The creation of events that will promoted irreconcilable interpretations in different interpretive communities has become a cottage industry for the rich and powerful. The radically divergent tales concerning massing shootings and attacks on minorities does wonders to exacerbate rifts between groups in the United States who might otherwise find common ground. These deep fissures in the basic assumptions about events render cooperation between these groups impossible.
Two common themes among conservatives are that attacks on minorities, and major mass shootings, are fake, false flag operations, and that climate change is a fraud used for the interests of the rich and powerful.
Let me start with a disclaimer. As no open, international investigations have ever been conducted concerning the incidents that I describe, my interpretation is by nature speculative. I would venture, however, that the critical points that I make, purposely are left out of coverage in both the mainstream media and in conspiracy blogs.
What is clear is that public intellectuals and reporters intentionally avoid difficult questions concerning these incidents, falling back on the argument that it is disrespectful of the families of those who were killed to suggest that the event was fabricated.
Two central cases are the Sandy Hook Elementary School (2012) shooting and the Boston Marathon Bombing (2013).
In the case of Sandy Hook, it is certainly possible that the attack was by a loner suffering from mental illness. Yet the vicious manner in which the mere suggestion that there might have been an incentive to create an event so as to increase police powers raises questions as to the motivations of those who deny even the possibility of a conspiracy.
In the case of the Boston Marathon Bombing, significant evidence exists that chronology of the bombing is inconsistent. The remarkably clean manner in which the entire event was pinned on Chechens who supposedly killed a police officer while trying to steal his gun sounds rather far-fetched. It is undeniable, however, that the Boston Marathon bombing was used to carry out an unprecedented lockdown of the entire city of Boston without any constitutional guarantees for citizens, or due process. That event was a frightening adumberation of the lockdowns of the United States in the name of COVID19 seven years later.
The significance of the Boston Marathon as commemoration of Patriot’s Day (granted it was held a few days earlier that year), a critical day in Boston history when American militia opened fire on the British at Lexington, was completely ignored by the media when they pinned the story on two terrorist bombers.
Yet, it was on Patriot’s Day, April 19, 1993 that the Federal government brutally crushed the Branch Davidians at Waco, an assault that included a needless fire which left dead seventy-six people.
It was on Patriot’s Day, April 19, 1995, that the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was destroyed in an attack attributed to Timothy McVeigh—an incident about which many questions still remain unanswered.
In addition, two days after the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013, a massive explosion (employing ammonium nitrate just like the explosion in Oklahoma) near Waco, Texas, killed fifteen people. None of these facts were mentioned in the media.
The Los Vegas shootings (October 1, 2017) suggest a possible strategy behind these attacks. The suspect Stephen Craig Paddock supposedly killed more than 60 people in less than 15 minutes of shooting from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel. This fact alone raised serious questions among experts.
As he committed suicide we never learned Paddock’s version of the story.
The striking part of the story is the contradictory reports from eyewitnesses.
Although they have vanished from the internet, there were videos posted of both real shootings with live ammunition in one part of the hotel and in other areas the sounds of gunfire were broadcast over a speaker.
The intension of such an approach (which may well have been used in other incidents) might well have been to create divergent interpretations of the event from the start. Those who argued that there was a real shooting had facts to back up their claims. Those who suggested that the shootings were a fraud, a false flag, were given also solid evidence.
A similar game appears to be under way concerning climate change.
Scientific evidence for catastrophic climate change in terms of spreading deserts, the warming and the acidification of oceans, the spread of micro-plastics through the water and soil, and the long-term warming of the atmosphere is indisputable. The campaigns of fake scientists receiving corporate funding to dismiss this complex phenomenon has not succeeded in convincing the public.
Because the launch of the COVID19 operation is directly linked to climate change, specifically to the need to assure the wellbeing of the 0.5% at the expense of the rest of the Earth, in light of the impending collapse of the ecological system, the highest priority is to make sure that no political figure emerges who addresses both COVID19 fraud and the threat of climate change.
Climate change advocates covered by the media, and funded by foundations, must argue for big green projects led by financial institutions that Bill Gates and friends can control, and they must back the COVID 19 myth.
The conservatives claim that climate change is a conspiracy cooked up the rich and powerful to oppress us and they present evidence in alternative news to support their perspective.
The assumption among the progressives, however, is that granted the scientific evidence for climate change, the conservatives must be “crazy” or “stupid.” Whether it is Rachel Maddow or Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks, or even socialist activists, the assumption is the same.
But might there be a more complex game at play?
Let us consider the case of the forest fires that swept the Earth in 2018, specifically the California wildfires. The gradual warming of the Earth, the reduction in rainfall, and the siphoning of water from aquafers for use in commercial agriculture is clearly the cause of the increase in forest fires globally.
But can we be certain that the argument made by conservatives that the California wildfires were started by arson, or enhanced thereby, with the purpose of frightening citizens into adopting a response to climate change commandeered by corporate power is ludicrous?
When Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed that the wildfires were started by lasers in orbit owned by the Rothchilds as part of a conspiracy to get a high-speed rail project approved by the state of California, she set off a firestorm in the liberal media. Everyone, literally everyone, rushed out to attack her as a “nut” without considering for a moment that perhaps some part of her story might be accurate.
I have read her claims carefully, and I have read related materials concerning the political conflicts in California at the time, and I do not find her argument convincing. It would be a mistake, however, to assume that because progressive causes attack her for anti-Semitism, and climate change advocates attack her for her ignorance of science, that her claims are unfounded.
In the first photo, we see that the houses in a development have been cleared down to the foundations in a manner that would be absolutely impossible in a forest fire, while the trees nearby stand virtually untouched.
This photograph, from a mainstream media source, presents information that immediately raises serious questions.
The second photographs indicates what appears to be melted aluminum that flowed from the automobiles burned in the forest fire. It is similarly improbable that a forest fire would burn at a temperature sufficient to melt steel or aluminum.
Following the basic principle of Occam’s razor, I would like to propose a more probable explanation for what happened. Perhaps the California wildfires, which are slowly increasing due to climate change, were purposely enhanced by artificial means, and in this case the houses were destroyed either by a strike from low-orbit military satellites, or were simply demolished in manner so as to suggest that such an attack had happened. Similarly, weapons were employed that were hot enough to melt metal, or perhaps this photograph was simply inserted in the article so as to suggest such an interpretation.
The real conspiracy might not be the Rothchild family’s ambitions in California, but rather the creation of an event that will be read in a radically divergent manner by different interpretive communities, so as to inhibit the formation of a broad consensus on the danger of corporate power and to discredit the real threat of climate change by creating real examples of falsified climate disaster.
Operation Civil War
The media of the left and of the right are cranking out stories about a possible civil war in the United States like there is no tomorrow. There are real reasons for fearing that such a domestic conflict may be in the offing. Already the low-intensity killings involving police and other vigilante groups are approaching the level of “Bleeding Kansas” in scale.
We must also ask ourselves whether the fascination of the mainsteam media with this theme suggests a more devious plan to divide and conquer. Forcing authority figures to put their reputations on the line pushing a COVID19 narrative that they do not buy has completely discredited the Federal Government, universities, the mainstream media and all the experts we rely on. The stage is set for open defiance of the entire system—which was perhaps the plan all along.
Civil war would serve to tear institutions apart and create an environment in which the super-rich, unimpeded, can push through even more radical institutional change. The actual class war between a handful of multibillionaires and the rest of the country would be hidden behind orchestrated fighting between “white nationalist terrorists” and “black lives matters” minorities that would be narrated in different media so as to stoke emotions, and to blind people to the real agenda.
This work is rendered easier by of the mistaken assumption of the upper middle class that they are on the same side as the super-rich, that Bill Gates or Elon Musk are just like them, only more successful.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The super-rich have so completely monopolized the financial system, and amassed such wealth, that for them the difference between a Harvard Professor, a US senator, a successful real estate mogul and a homeless man is insignificant. They have launched against the rest of humanity that targets not only workers and immigrants, but the entire upper middle class as well.
It is critical for the strategy, however, that the upper-middle class, all those with measly assets under one brick (100 million dollars) be convinced that they are on the side of the super-rich, and not on the side of the working class.
The new economic reality, however, is clear. The forced quarantine at airports, the forced lockdowns of schools, even in upper-middle class neighborhoods, makes it clear that policy is made for a handful of people and that even families with millions of dollars of assets are not significant for the planners.
The decision of Princeton University to require COVID19 vaccines of all students over the summer, or be denied registration, indicates just how extreme the concentration of wealth and power has become.
Most people assume that the students at elite Ivy League colleges are so privileged that they could not possibly be sacrificed for corporate profits through the use of dangerous “vaccine.” If Princeton students must to take the vaccine, obviously students in India, Brazil, Spain and Japan will have to too.
As far as the super-rich are concerned, however, the lawyers, doctors, bankers and professors who send their children to Princeton are no consequence. They are betting that the lag time between the start of this COVID19 operation and the point when educated people finally grasp the new political reality will be sufficient to vaccinate the vast majority of humanity.
The Collapse of civilization
Ultimately, the contagion of massive fictions in the United States cannot be explained simply in terms of the economic interests of the rich. Much of the scientific evidence about COVID19 is accessible on the internet with a bit of effort and anyone who reads it with care will be forced to admit that the testimony of hundreds of scientists is convincing. Moreover, advocates for mandatory vaccines are never forced to enter into public debates with the medical experts who criticize the entire COVID19 regime.
Educated Americans willingly refuse to read these scientific materials, or to engage in a thoughtful discussions with their peers.
American lawyers and doctors, executives and professors resemble the characters in “The Sleepwalkers” (Die Schlafwandler), an novel by the Austrian writer Hermann Broch that describes the lives of the ruling class of Germany caught up in the collapsing cultural order before the First World War. Broch’s novel describes the bizarre psychological state of the educated classes of Germany. People lived like sleepwalkers; functional in society, competent at their jobs, even capable of appreciating fine music and art. Yet those same intellectuals were in the most profound sense blind, completely oblivious to the signs of systemic collapse. Because they could perform sophisticated jobs while remaining oblivious to the spread of militarism, the end of the rule of law and the demands on the economy made by overproduction, they made the unthinkable possible.
The Origin of this crisis is not corrupt politicians and CEOs, or bad policies and poor planning.
Deep down the entire system, the civilization, is decaying. The educated and informed who could be leaders are left confused, engaged in self-destructive acts as a result. We see unfolding the human version of colony collapse disorder, when the majority of worker bees in a honey bee hive inexplicably disappear, leaving behind the queen, plenty of food, and a few nurse bees.
We cannot even start to get a handle on this civilizational crisis because our discussions of politics and economics have been stripped of all discussion of philosophy and literature, aesthetics and history. The push for the efficient and practical forced on education by corporations has left us blind and helpless, unable to grasp the invisible shifts taking place at a subterranean level within society.
Paul Levy argues that our current society is wracked by the psycho-spiritual disease “wetiko” (the native American term) which is impervious to the anti-psychotics dished out by therapists like candy at Halloween. Wekiko is a disease in our civilization that feeds like a parasite on the spirit, a collective psychosis that has seized control of the entire system of things.
Levy notes that for those captured by wekiko, “You’re blind and you do not know you are blind, and in fact imagine that you can see clearly. You come to believe that you can see more clearly than those who are clear-sighted. You then become unaware of what it is to be sighted, as you have no reference point for comparison. You do not see how you are unwittingly colluding with wetiko’s pernicious effects and thereby you are unaware of how you are having negative or ill effects upon others and the world.”
Such words describe perfectly the vast majority of the ruling class in the United States who, now spiritually crippled, are leading the entire population of the Earth to the edge of the cliff.
« Le procès de destitution : Pour la défense de Donald Trump »
Note de l’éditeur de Global Research
Nous ne sommes pas des partisans de Trump, loin s’en faut, et le Dr Emanuel Pastreich, auteur de cet article incisif et opportun, non plus.
Au cours de la présidence Trump, nous avons publié diverses opinions, dont la plupart constituent une critique des échecs, des abus et des actes illégaux commis par l’administration Trump.
Nous sommes basés au Canada. Nous ne sommes pas impliqués dans la politique bipartisane aux États-Unis. Ni les Républicains ni les Démocrates ne servent l’intérêt du peuple américain.
Nous publions diverses opinions sur la politique intérieure américaine et la politique étrangère américaine. Dans certains cas, nous pouvons être en désaccord avec les auteurs que nous publions. Nous n’imposons cependant pas de ligne éditoriale à nos auteurs.
Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 9 janvier 2021
Les avocats employés par Donald Trump ont amassé une pile impressionnante d’arguments pour le défendre contre les accusations selon lesquelles il aurait incité une foule de ses partisans à organiser une insurrection armée dans le but d’empêcher la sélection de son adversaire démocratiquement élu. Il n’est pas populaire dans l’inconstante féerie de Washington D.C. de défendre Donald Trump, et encore moins de le louer. Mais en cette triste heure de l’histoire de notre nation, c’est précisément ce qu’il faut faire.
Malheureusement, il est peu probable que le procès en destitution prévu pour le 9 février aborde les véritables violations de la Constitution par l’administration Trump, ou les réalisations importantes de Donald Trump au cours de son mandat.
Comme le dernier procès de destitution qui s’est concentré sur une collusion russe ambiguë et amorphe, et a laissé intacte la criminalité de l’ensemble de l’exécutif (sur lequel Trump avait peu de contrôle).
Ce procès n’a qu’un seul but : servir d’avertissement à tous les politiciens américains que le système est prêt à les goudronner et à les plumer, à les attaquer pour des choses qu’ils n’ont pas faites, puis à les faire tomber avec le monde entier comme public captif.
En d’autres termes, le Président des États-Unis dans les années à venir ressemblera aux empereurs de l’empire romain dont les règnes ont rarement duré plus de quelques années : des hommes qui ont été battus par les généraux comme un chat joue avec une souris.
Le pouvoir exécutif tentaculaire a pour tentacules des sociétés de conseil, des entrepreneurs de l’armée et des forces de l’ordre, ainsi qu’une multitude de syndicats de lobbying qui considèrent la corruption comme une journée de travail bien remplie. Aucun de ces acteurs ne sera jugé pour la Saint-Valentin. Reprocher leurs péchés à Donald Trump, puis présenter au monde le “pay to play” Joe Biden comme une bouffée d’air frais progressiste, est une véritable alchimie.
Malgré tous ses péchés, qu’il s’agisse de son mauvais goût vestimentaire, de l’intérieur de ses hôtels, de ses liens avec le crime organisé ou de sa soumission à un public avide de sensationnel, Trump était un homme qui essayait simplement de déjouer le système de l’intérieur pour son bénéfice personnel, mais aussi pour certains principes honorables. Malheureusement, il est devenu prisonnier du système au cours de ce processus. Il est accusé de péchés inventés ou exagérés, ses véritables erreurs sont passées sous silence et ses véritables réalisations sont ignorées.
Le cas de Donald Trump
Donald Trump, un homme qui n’avait jamais exercé de fonction publique avant de devenir président, un homme qui ne connaissait pas grand-chose à la politique fiscale et sociale, ni aux relations internationales, un homme qui était obligé de se tourner vers une poignée d’acteurs politiques, et vers les multimilliardaires rusés derrière les rideaux, pour obtenir des conseils dans sa “bataille avec l’État profond” – un spectacle parfait pour Le Sahara – était à la fois pathétique et tragique.
Je conteste, cependant, l’hypothèse selon laquelle Trump était intrinsèquement moins qualifié que Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama ou Joe Biden, trois individus profondément liés à la finance mondiale, aux fabricants d’armes et à une foule d’autres organisations parasites qui s’acharnent à détruire les États-Unis pour le profit. Le fait que ces acteurs mondiaux aient interagi avec ces hommes prétendument nobles par l’intermédiaire du Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs de l’université de Harvard n’a en rien atténué leur caractère criminel. Aucun de ces politiciens n’aurait jamais dû être considéré comme candidat à ce poste.
La récente orgie de couverture médiatique au sujet de Trump n’a rien à voir avec ses véritables erreurs, mais est plutôt un stratagème cynique pour faire paraître légitime l’État policier COVID-19 de l’administration Biden, teinté de progressisme, et aussi pour créer un nouvel ennemi pour l’imagination du public : le supporter raciste ignorant de Trump portant le chapeau MAGA.
Cette dernière création est le premier pas vers la désignation de toute personne qui remet en question les conspirations criminelles qui battent leur plein aujourd’hui par le terme de “terroriste national” et son enfermement si le “tsar de la réalité” nouvellement nommé le juge bon.
L’ascension de Trump au pouvoir politique est le résultat de son succès dans la promotion immobilière, de sa gestion de casinos, de ses spéculations dans diverses affaires louches et de son utilisation efficace de la télévision à sensation pour gagner un public fidèle. Il n’est pas nécessaire d’expliquer qu’on ne peut pas être impliqué dans la construction et les casinos à ce niveau sans être lié au racket et au blanchiment d’argent, à la prostitution et au crime organisé.
Mais les Démocrates et les Républicains qui ont empoché de l’argent de banques d’investissement mondiales qui s’enrichissent en faisant la promotion de la guerre (au nom de la paix), qui font passer de dangereux accords de libre-échange et qui ont participé au viol de la Réserve fédérale, sont encore plus diaboliques.
Le visage de Trump est plus honnête que celui des diplômés de l’Ivy League, cultivés, sensibles à la culture et à la diversité ethnique, qui ont utilisé leur image empathique pour nous cacher la guerre brutale que ces institutions financières mondiales mènent contre les gens ordinaires.
Donald Trump s’est rendu coupable de violations de la Constitution et de la loi fédérale au cours de son administration qui méritent une destitution. Point barre.
Dans le même temps, cependant, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush et Barak Obama se sont tous rendus coupables de nombreux actes en violation de la Constitution et de la loi fédérale qui méritent la destitution. En fait, la vraie question est de savoir pourquoi les intellectuels américains ont décidé de laisser la branche exécutive gonflée, tentaculaire et putride s’en tirer avec toute cette criminalité institutionnalisée.
Les membres démocrates et républicains du Congrès qui se rassembleront comme des chacals pour le procès en destitution, des hommes et des femmes qui ont détourné le regard lorsque les puissances financières mondiales ont volé 10 000 milliards ou plus à la Réserve fédérale et qui ont ensuite eu le culot de dire que la crise économique était le résultat du COVID19, devraient être jugés eux aussi.
Les erreurs tragiques de Trump
La décision de Trump de se présenter aux élections présidentielles remonte au dîner des correspondants de la Maison-Blanche, le 30 avril 2011. Il a fait l’objet de moqueries acerbes de la part de Barak Obama qui avait l’intention de l’humilier en public et de détruire sa carrière politique.
La colère de Trump était inscrite sur son visage car il n’est pas un politicien.
Pourquoi Trump était-il si furieux ?
Personnellement, je ne suis pas convaincu que le “Mouvement Birther” de Trump, qui a tenté de prouver qu’Obama n’était pas un citoyen américain et qu’il était un musulman secret, était approprié ou exact. En fin de compte, je ne sais pas.
Je crains toutefois que de nombreux Américains ne comprennent pas les motivations sous-jacentes de cette campagne. La stratégie était sensationnaliste, comme le catcheur professionnel dans l’âme qu’est Trump, mais les moyens d’attaque politique que Trump a employés n’étaient pas entièrement son choix.
La plupart des accords corrompus conclus par l’administration Obama avec la finance mondiale sont protégés de l’examen public parce que les transactions ont été rendues classifiées, ou parce que des accords de non-divulgation rendent impossible de rendre ces crimes publics. Dans de nombreux cas, une loi secrète adoptée par le Congrès rend illégale la discussion de ces actions corrompues. L’ère post-Bush en Amérique est définie par une politique de l’indicible.
Trump s’en est pris à Obama sur la question du birther, et à Biden sur la fraude électorale, non pas parce que c’était nécessairement sa carte la plus forte, mais parce que c’était la seule carte qu’il était autorisé à jouer, la seule chose que les médias allaient rapporter.
C’est l’attitude d’Obama ce soir-là qui a irrité Trump. Obama, un homme parachuté dans la campagne présidentielle de 2008, sorti de nulle part pour servir les intérêts des super-riches, a affiché un mépris évident pour Trump et ses partisans.
Trump voulait épingler le rusé Obama pour sa corruption flagrante, mais il n’a pas pu.
Lorsque Trump a condamné ouvertement les guerres étrangères, il a été qualifié de nazi en herbe par la presse libérale. Obama, en revanche, a couvert ses propos sur les interventions à l’étranger pour ne pas froisser General Dynamics et a reçu le prix Nobel de la paix 2009 pour avoir embrassé le militarisme américain et renoncé à sa tiède critique de la guerre en Irak.
Se présenter à la présidence en tant qu’outsider était le meilleur moyen de se venger, s’est dit Trump, que devenir le président qui remplacerait ce jouet bien entretenu des élites financières serait savoureux, comme le disent les Français “La vengeance est un plat qui se mange froid”.
Trump savait que s’il voulait remporter la présidence en tant qu’outsider, il devait puiser dans la colère qui bouillonnait à cause de la corruption à Washington D.C. et de la politique élitiste d’Obama. Une partie de cette réponse avait des connotations racistes, mais une grande partie n’en avait pas.
Bien que Trump ait de l’argent, il était un petit poisson dans le milieu de plus en plus décadent de Washington. Une fois rentré à l’hôtel Trump après le brutal “rôti” d’Obama, il a réfléchi aux acteurs de pouvoir qu’il pourrait rallier à sa cause et qui seraient capables d’égaler le soutien des banques d’investissement sur lesquelles les démocrates (et les républicains) comptaient pour se hisser au sommet du jeu de l’argent.
Il a dressé une liste d’outsiders affamés qui étaient prêts à prendre un risque sur sa rhétorique populiste parce qu’eux aussi n’avaient pas l’influence politique qu’ils estimaient que leur argent méritait. Bien qu’il y en ait eu d’autres, identifions quatre groupes importants de partisans qui ont poussé fort pour que Trump soit sur la carte, et qui n’avaient que faire de son opposition au libre-échange ou de ses appels aux travailleurs.
Ces quatre groupes, cependant, ne se souciaient pas de Donald Trump personnellement, et lorsqu’il a été piégé à la fin de sa présidence pour être diagnostiqué avec le faux “COVID19” et ensuite accusé d’avoir lancé le faux drapeau “Insurrection du Capitole” dirigé par un clown, ces forces n’avaient aucun intérêt à l’aider.
Je soupçonne que Trump a pensé que, tel un maître surfeur, il pourrait d’une manière ou d’une autre surfer sur les vagues convergentes qui seraient libérées par ces puissances et faire avancer cette “bande de rivaux” afin d’obtenir quelque chose de valable tout en améliorant sa propre marque.
Les quatre groupes suivants ont vu en Trump une chance de secouer Washington et d’obtenir leur part du gâteau.
David et Charles Koch
Les frères Koch ont versé leurs milliards de charbon et de pétrole dans le financement de l’idéologie “libertaire” comme un moyen de cacher la fin de la réglementation des entreprises sous la peau de mouton de la “liberté” individuelle. Le résultat a été une augmentation massive de la pollution et la fin de la politique environnementale aux États-Unis.
Les frères Koch ont été remarquablement créatifs. Ils ont mis en place un think tank sournois, le Charles Koch Institute, qui a séduit divers intellectuels “anti-guerre” grâce à ses gros financements et à son exposition médiatique, et a ainsi donné une légitimité à leur programme d’entreprise.
Les frères Koch ont soutenu Trump, et l’ont présenté à leur représentant Mike Pompeo (qui avait des liens étroits avec la droite chrétienne) en échange d’une promesse de Trump de sortir le gouvernement de l’activité de réglementation et de mener des politiques ridicules concernant le changement climatique. Les frères Koch voulaient obtenir le même respect à Washington DC que les acteurs mondiaux comme Exxon et BP et s’immiscer dans la politique énergétique qui était auparavant déterminée par les grandes entreprises.
Betsy (Prince) DeVos et Erik Prince
Bien que le début de la relation entre Trump et la famille Prince reste opaque, Betsy (Prince) DeVos, épouse de l’héritier de la fortune Amway, et son frère Erik Prince, PDG de la société de mercenaires privés Academi, se sont attachés à Trump très tôt et lui ont donné un grand coup de pouce.
Betsy (Prince) DeVos a exigé d’être nommée secrétaire à l’éducation et a utilisé ce poste pour détruire l’éducation publique dans le cadre d’un plan plus vaste visant à transformer toute l’éducation en une industrie à but lucratif et à rendre une grande partie de la population si peu éduquée qu’elle serait incapable de s’opposer à la prise de contrôle de l’Amérique par les entreprises. Les problèmes de l’éducation, cependant, étaient un effort bipartisan des 30 dernières années et non la création de Betsy DeVos.
Trump l’a laissée faire ce qu’elle voulait sans presque aucune interférence.
Erik Prince a demandé une chance de pousser à la privatisation radicale de l’armée qui permettrait à ses groupes de mercenaires d’obtenir des contrats pour des travaux auparavant limités à l’armée elle-même, ou aux grands entrepreneurs militaires. Le soutien précoce à Trump a donné carte blanche à Erik pour étendre ses opérations mercenaires dans le monde entier, ce qui l’a amené à se battre sérieusement avec des officiers militaires.
Les Princes ont également lié Trump à un autre acteur important, Robert Mercer, le PDG de Renaissance Technologies. Le “milliardaire silencieux” Mercer a soutenu les stratégies innovantes de Steve Bannon pour susciter un soutien politique par le biais de reportages racistes et anti-immigrés dans son Breitbart News (mélangés à une bonne dose de vérité) et il a jeté les bases du décollage médiatique soudain de Trump.
Le magnat du casino Sheldon Adelson
Donald Trump avait des liens avec Israël par l’intermédiaire de son gendre Jared Kushner et par des interactions avec divers hommes d’affaires sionistes depuis longtemps (y compris des liens avec la Russie), mais il n’a pas pris de positions fortes sur la politique israélienne. Il a également reçu le soutien dans sa campagne de nombreux Américains profondément hostiles à l’influence israélienne à Washington D.C. et qui ont exigé une enquête sur l’incident du 9.11 et le rôle d’Israël.
Mais le vieil ami de Trump, Sheldon Adelson, était un homme aux poches profondes, aux relations solides en Israël et à l’esprit stratégique nécessaire pour faire passer Trump en tête. Adelson est l’un des grands patrons des casinos dans le monde et a probablement été l’une des personnes que Trump a appelées dès le début. Il a apporté son soutien enthousiaste et ses appels téléphoniques ont rendu l’offre de Trump viable.
Adelson a rapidement mis Trump en contact avec des figures centrales du sionisme chrétien, comme John Hagee, qui soutenait inconditionnellement les politiques les plus radicales d’Israël, et il a fait de Mike Pompeo (également lié aux frères Koch) un acteur politique central. Adelson a probablement aussi joué un rôle en présentant à Trump un autre sioniste chrétien en pleine ascension, le vice-président Mike Pence.
Les églises sionistes chrétiennes à travers les États-Unis jouent un rôle essentiel dans l’apport de votes et la collecte de fonds pour les causes conservatrices. La volonté de Trump d’embrasser les exigences extrêmes de ces églises a permis aux ministres de ces églises de le soutenir malgré ses multiples mariages et ses valeurs laxistes et indulgentes.
Adelson n’a pas passé ces heures à son rolodex pour rien. Il a obtenu une administration (à défaut d’un Trump) qui embrasse aveuglément Israël, et accorde un soutien total à tout conflit militaire israélien avec l’Iran.
Le lobby de la “guerre contre la Chine »
La promotion des conflits militaires et la vente de systèmes d’armes hors de prix est un spectacle bipartisan exquis et même les pacificateurs ne peuvent fonctionner au Congrès sans le feu vert des grands. Pour un outsider total, avec une réputation peu impressionnante et aucune expérience politique, il n’y avait pas beaucoup de place à l’auge pour Trump.
Un peu de flair, cependant, a révélé qu’il y avait un groupe dans le complexe militaro-industriel qui était extrêmement mécontent malgré le budget de la défense gonflé et qui cherchait quelqu’un pour défendre leur cause impopulaire pendant les années Obama.
Ce groupe était constitué des fabricants d’armes qui fournissent les gros équipements lourds tels que les porte-avions, les avions de chasse, les armes nucléaires et les systèmes de défense antimissile.
La “guerre contre le terrorisme” de Donald Rumsfeld a introduit le concept dangereux de “révolution dans la guerre” et une grande partie de leur matériel encombrant a été considérée comme dépassée par une nouvelle génération d’experts en sécurité.
Le nouvel accent mis sur le renseignement a engraissé leurs rivaux et leur a coûté quelques gros contrats militaires, le Pentagone imitant de plus en plus la CIA.
En outre, la pression exercée par les nouveaux venus, comme Boston Robotics, pour les exclure définitivement et faire des satellites, des drones, des robots et de l’IA le point central des dépenses militaires, les a fait voir rouge.
Bien que ces entrepreneurs apprécient la Russie en tant qu’adversaire, seul un scénario de guerre massive du Pacifique avec la Chine pourrait justifier les piles de matériel qu’ils veulent produire. Il n’est pas surprenant que ces groupes aient été poussés à bout lorsqu’Obama a proposé une coopération militaro-militaire avec la Chine, notamment en invitant la Chine à participer aux exercices navals RIMPAC à Hawaï.
La faction “guerre avec la Chine” n’est pas une société spécifique. Il s’agit d’importantes sections de Northrop Grumman, Lockeed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon et d’autres entrepreneurs qui avaient tout à gagner d’une poussée en faveur de grands navires et d’avions de chasse de haute technologie, d’outils pour des débarquements amphibies massifs. En même temps, les entreprises avaient aussi des unités qui ne sont pas intéressées par ce marché.
Trump a proposé de jeter la politique de la Chine unique de Nixon dans les poubelles de l’histoire et d’adopter des actions agressives en Asie de l’Est qui donneraient le coup d’envoi d’une “nouvelle guerre froide.” Ce groupe s’est rangé derrière Trump et lui a donné les références de sécurité qui lui manquaient.
Les réalisations de Trump
Si l’on jette un regard rétrospectif sur les quatre années de Trump, on constate que la plupart des dommages qui lui sont attribués sont plutôt le produit d’un délabrement institutionnel accéléré par la gangrène spirituelle abrutissante qui a infecté l’Amérique après l’incident du 11 septembre. Trump doit assumer la responsabilité d’avoir permis à des figures criminelles de diriger le spectacle, de dépouiller le gouvernement de ses compétences et de pousser à la guerre avec la Chine et l’Iran, mais Trump n’en était certainement pas le cerveau.
Il avait l’impression d’être lui-même assigné à résidence à la Maison Blanche lorsque les grands garçons se battaient – et il était parfaitement conscient que les pouvoirs en place étaient plus qu’heureux de le jeter sous le bus – comme ils l’ont finalement fait – pour atteindre leurs objectifs.
Et pourtant, aussi téméraire qu’ait pu être la tentative de Trump d’utiliser ces parias du banquet des dépouilles de DC comme moyen de prendre le contrôle du parti républicain, puis de renverser le système corrompu de l’intérieur, les efforts suivants suggèrent qu’à un certain niveau, Trump a maintenu un engagement à remettre les choses en ordre, et qu’il a essayé de s’attaquer à des problèmes que les autres politiciens avaient peur d’aborder.
Les actions suivantes ne seront pas mentionnées lors du procès de mise en accusation, mais elles devraient l’être.
1. L’engagement en faveur de la vérité sur le 11 septembre
Dans son interview avec Fox News le 11 septembre 2001, Donald Trump a fait des commentaires qui ont soulevé de sérieux doutes concernant la théorie de la conspiration du 11 septembre selon laquelle des terroristes arabes tenant des coupe-papiers ont abattu trois gratte-ciel avec deux avions. Trump a continué à aborder cette question en privé et il n’a pas hésité à entretenir des liens étroits avec les militants de la vérité sur le 11 septembre.
Sa volonté, en tant que président en exercice, de tolérer, et même d’encourager, la discussion des problèmes scientifiques liés à l’histoire officielle était risquée pour sa santé et l’a éloigné des politiciens traditionnels, démocrates et républicains. Sa volonté d’assumer cette tâche impossible témoignait d’une loyauté sincère envers ses partisans – une solidarité qu’il n’a jamais abandonnée, même lorsqu’il fréquentait les riches et les puissants.
2. Demande de publication de documents classifiés sur l’assassinat de Kennedy.
Donald Trump a utilisé des décrets en octobre 2017 pour tenter de forcer la CIA et le FBI à publier tous les documents classifiés restants concernant l’assassinat de Kennedy en 1963. La conspiration criminelle dans la finance mondiale, l’industrie et le gouvernement pour tuer Kennedy est évidente pour quiconque a examiné l’affaire même superficiellement. Pourtant, le gouvernement fédéral refuse toujours de publier les documents restants qui feront comprendre au monde entier ce qui s’est passé, et exactement qui était responsable de quoi.
La pression de Trump pour obtenir la publication de ces documents n’est pas une faveur pour les historiens et les amateurs de conspiration.
La manière dont la finance mondiale a pu assassiner de sang-froid un président qui tentait de rétablir la responsabilité des services de renseignement et de l’armée a engendré un cancer à croissance lente au sein de l’exécutif, qui ne cesse de s’aggraver depuis. De nombreux problèmes institutionnels, tels que l’incapacité de tout président à soumettre le Pentagone ou la CIA à un audit sérieux, peuvent être attribués à ce triste jour de novembre 1963.
En effet, chaque président américain sait qu’il peut être tué en toute impunité comme Kennedy, ou humilié publiquement, s’il ose s’en tenir à la Constitution ou défier le gouvernement fantôme de la finance.
Les actions de Trump étaient courageuses, et même inspirantes. Vous pouvez être sûrs que ni Bernie Sanders ni Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, chouchous de la “gauche”, n’oseront jamais faire une telle demande.
3. S’attaquer à l’utilisation de l’immigration pour détruire la vie des travailleurs américains.
Les attaques vicieuses (au gouvernement et dans les rues) contre les immigrants, encouragées par la rhétorique qui se déverse de la bouche de Donald Trump, sont cruelles et irrationnelles. De telles actions doivent être condamnées.
Mais nous pouvons marcher et mâcher du chewing-gum en même temps en tant que citoyens. Aussi offensante et divisive que soit la rhétorique de Trump, nous devons reconnaître deux faits essentiels : 1) une série de directives classifiées et de lois secrètes ont empêché Trump de parler directement de la façon dont la crise de l’immigration était liée aux actions des entreprises et des banques d’investissement ; 2) ses adversaires démocrates étaient intimement impliqués dans la mise en œuvre de l’immigration comme arme de lutte des classes, mais ils n’ont jamais été appelés sur ce point par les intellectuels publics dits ” progressistes “.
La ruée vers l’immigration en provenance d’Amérique centrale et d’Amérique du Sud vers les États-Unis était le résultat du complot des multinationales visant à détruire les économies locales de ces pays et à dévaster l’agriculture et l’artisanat par le biais d’un plan impitoyable de libre-échange et de libre investissement combiné à des paiements en espèces aux politiciens pour qu’ils jouent les idiots.
Les travailleurs d’Amérique latine n’ont pas eu d’autre choix que d’essayer de se rendre aux États-Unis.
Dans le même temps, les banques et les sociétés multinationales ont utilisé la politique d’immigration dans le cadre d’une stratégie visant à détruire les fondements économiques de la vie du travailleur américain, faisant de lui un pion impuissant dans leur poussée vers une nouvelle forme d’esclavage. Les démocrates ont gardé le silence sur cette grande conspiration et Trump a eu raison de dénoncer cette politique délibérée visant à détruire l’Amérique par l’immigration.
La loi secrète et les directives classifiées rendaient impossible toute discussion sur ces politiques brutales dans les médias américains. Lorsque Trump a pris l’initiative inhabituelle d’aborder la lutte des classes par le biais de l’immigration, il a été contraint par les circonstances de la décrire à l’aide de caricatures faisant appel à l’idéologie raciste.
Il a le mérite d’avoir attiré l’attention sur cette question.
4. Opposition à l’idéologie du libre-échange
Trump a été le seul candidat de la campagne présidentielle de 2016 à aborder directement la manière dont la promotion des régimes de “libre-échange” a été employée par les riches pour détruire les fondements économiques de la vie des Américains.
Il a été vertement condamné pour avoir sapé l’engagement de l’Amérique envers les accords commerciaux mondiaux et les traités financiers. Les conservateurs, les progressistes – et tous ceux qui se situent entre les deux – ont été heureux de prendre un coup de couteau. Mais aussi incendiaire que sa rhétorique ait pu être, Trump a identifié une conspiration criminelle des riches du monde entier visant à créer la misère économique par le biais du commerce.
Les politiciens démocrates progressistes qui prétendaient se préoccuper des travailleurs ont rarement hésité à voter pour des accords de libre-échange. Ils prétendaient que ces accords aideraient les gens ordinaires alors qu’ils savaient pertinemment qu’ils étaient au profit des multinationales. Trump s’est tenu pratiquement seul pour condamner l’arnaque commerciale et il mérite d’être félicité pour ses efforts.
5. Opposition ouverte au mandat de masque, au verrouillage économique et au régime de vaccination au nom du COVID19.
Donald Trump a tenté à de nombreuses reprises de remettre en question la promotion de la fausse pandémie de COVID19 en tant que catastrophe nationale, l’insistance sur le port obligatoire de masques sans aucune base scientifique et les demandes absurdes de verrouillage de l’économie et de fermeture des bâtiments publics et des écoles. Il était l’un des rares politiciens prêts à adopter une telle position et, par conséquent, il a obtenu le soutien, lors de l’élection présidentielle, des Afro-Américains et d’autres groupes qui n’auraient normalement jamais soutenu un républicain.
Lorsque Trump a remis en question la nécessité des dangereux “vaccins” COVID19 promus par des multinationales pharmaceutiques comme Pfizer, qui contiennent de l’ARN messager destructeur et une variété de traceurs et de capteurs intégrés dans l’hydrogel du DARPA, sa position a été héroïque.
Bien que Trump ait adopté une position antiscientifique lorsqu’il a remis en question le changement climatique en réponse aux demandes des frères Koch, il a été soutenu à 100% par la science, et par de nombreux scientifiques, dans le cas du COVID-19.
Le résultat ? Trump a fait l’objet d’attaques de toutes parts dans les médias corrompus pour ses déclarations pleines de bon sens. Les chouchous de la “gauche” démocrate se sont précipités pour embrasser la marionnette corporatiste Anthony Fauci lorsqu’il a attaqué Trump pour ne pas avoir mis fin à l’économie et qu’il a fait la promotion de ces “vaccins” dangereux.”
En outre, lorsque Trump a été contraint d’approuver les vaccins, il a prononcé des discours dans lesquels il a parlé d’un projet de “distorsion” pour les développer en quelques mois, ce qui aurait normalement pris des années ou des décennies.
Trump a fait l’éloge des vaccins d’une manière délibérément exagérée comme un moyen de télégraphier la vérité au peuple sur la vraie nature des vaccins par-dessus les barrières à la diffusion de l’information érigées à Washington D.C. Un tel geste était ingénieux et courageux – mais moqué dans les médias.
6. Le soutien à une discussion ouverte sur les conspirations criminelles aux États-Unis.
La transformation des sources progressistes du journalisme en spectacles de marionnettes où le pouvoir corporatif habille ses fictions avec les vêtements usagés de la tradition de la gauche américaine est une tragédie aux proportions épiques. Nous assistons à un discours pathétique sur la politique dans lequel la “gauche” agit comme un chien de salon dressé, incapable de parler d’aucune des véritables conspirations.
Il est tout à l’honneur de Donald Trump d’avoir eu le courage de s’engager activement dans une discussion ouverte avec ceux qui demandent une enquête sur les conspirations criminelles qui ont lieu en Amérique, et d’avoir encouragé une remise en question fondamentale du rôle du gouvernement et des entreprises.
Plus précisément, Trump a été attaqué de toutes parts pour ses liens avec les croyants du “culte” de QAnon.
QAnon est un initié qui divulgue des informations sur des actions criminelles aux plus hauts niveaux du gouvernement. Si vous faites une recherche sur QAnon, vous trouverez des articles qui le condamnent comme un colporteur de complots frauduleux, qui dénoncent ses positions racistes et isolationnistes, mais vous ne verrez pas les textes de QAnon cités pour que le lecteur puisse juger par lui-même.
Aucun des journaux ne donne même l’adresse du site web de QAnon : qanon.pub. Wikipedia rejette QAnon, en disant ,
“QAnon est une théorie de la conspiration d’extrême droite réfutée et discréditée qui prétend qu’une cabale secrète de pédophiles cannibales adorateurs de Satan dirige un réseau mondial de trafic sexuel d’enfants et complote contre l’ancien président américain Donald Trump, qui a combattu la cabale. Selon les procureurs américains, QAnon est communément appelé une secte.”
L’hypothèse selon laquelle les démocrates (et les républicains) traditionnels ne peuvent pas être liés à la prostitution et à la pédophilie est facilement prouvée fausse. D’ailleurs, aucun politicien traditionnel n’a essayé de discréditer QAnon en lançant des enquêtes scientifiques internationales sur les affirmations qu’il fait sur l’incident du 11 septembre ou la campagne COVID19.
Les inexactitudes significatives de QAnon sont un problème qui ne peut être résolu que par un effort ouvert pour identifier les parties exactes. Le problème plus important est l’échec de la plupart des intellectuels à condamner les fictions flagrantes colportées par le New York Times et le Washington Post.
Quoi qu’il en soit, la volonté de Trump, en tant que président, de s’attaquer aux conspirations massives est une première étape nécessaire, et c’est tout à son honneur.
7. Remise en question de la légitimité de l’élection
On nous répète sans cesse que Biden a remporté l’élection de manière juste et transparente et que les efforts de Trump pour contester l’élection sont égoïstes et corrompus. Ce récit est une fraude massive.
On ne sait pas très bien qui a gagné cette élection, ou si c’était une élection tout court. Quoi qu’il en soit, nous devrions nous réjouir que Trump soit le premier candidat qui ait été prêt à s’opposer à la manipulation massive du vote par les puissances corporatives. Nous ne pouvons que souhaiter qu’Al Gore ou John Kerry, ou Bernie Sanders, ou bien d’autres, aient eu le cran de se lever et de refuser d’accepter les élections bidon qui nous sont imposées.
L’élection de 2020 était truquée dès le départ. Les puissances financières qui dirigent les États-Unis ont émis une série de directives classifiées, et ont fait adopter par le Congrès des lois secrètes qui déterminaient qui seraient les candidats et quels sujets pourraient, ou non, être abordés.
Ce n’est un secret pour personne que le camp Biden a utilisé tous les sales coups de sa boîte à outils pour s’assurer la nomination démocrate, y compris la manipulation du vote dans les primaires pour battre Bernie Sanders.
Pourquoi supposerait-on alors que l’équipe Biden ne manipulerait pas le vote de manière similaire lors de l’élection générale – surtout à la lumière du soutien qu’il a reçu des néoconservateurs proches du clan Bush ?
Dans des cas flagrants comme le revirement soudain en faveur de Biden en Pennsylvanie, les progressistes soucieux du processus démocratique auraient dû exiger une enquête internationale qui aurait documenté de manière transparente les détails du vote. Aucun démocrate n’a demandé ne serait-ce que le rétablissement des sondages à la sortie des urnes.
C’est tout à son honneur, et non un signe de son égoïsme, que Trump a refusé de concéder l’élection.
Le véritable crime est que les progressistes ont refusé d’exiger une enquête scientifique sur les résultats de l’élection, plutôt que de se jeter aux pieds de Biden comme s’il était la réincarnation de Robert Kennedy.
8. Condamnation des guerres étrangères sans fin
Vous savez que vous êtes dans la “Twilight Zone” lorsque les progressistes qui tombent à bras raccourcis pour condamner Trump pour racisme et bellicisme se taisent ensuite lorsqu’il, en tant que président des États-Unis en exercice, condamne les “guerres éternelles” criminelles des vingt dernières années et attaque le système d’approvisionnement en armes à but lucratif.
Les commentaires de Trump le 7 septembre 2020 condamnant les guerres étrangères, et dénonçant les profiteurs de guerre, ont dépassé tout ce que vous trouverez sortant de la bouche des démocrates – et ce n’était pas la seule déclaration publique de ce type de sa part. Il a déclaré :
“Avec Biden, on a expédié nos emplois, ouvert nos frontières et envoyé nos jeunes se battre dans ces folles guerres sans fin. Et c’est l’une des raisons pour lesquelles l’armée – je ne dis pas que l’armée est amoureuse de moi, les soldats le sont. Les hauts responsables du Pentagone ne le sont probablement pas, parce qu’ils ne veulent rien faire d’autre que de faire la guerre pour que toutes ces merveilleuses entreprises qui fabriquent les bombes, qui fabriquent les avions, qui fabriquent tout le reste restent heureuses. Mais nous sommes en train de sortir de ces guerres sans fin”.
Il a terminé ses commentaires,
“Ramenons nos soldats à la maison. Certaines personnes n’aiment pas rentrer à la maison. Certaines personnes aiment continuer à dépenser de l’argent. Une trahison mondialiste sans pitié après l’autre. C’est ce que c’était.”
L’intégralité du discours était du théâtre, et il n’était pas tout à fait exact, mais Trump a réussi à glisser devant les censeurs une critique du système brisé qu’aucun autre politicien n’a pu faire.
En fait, les commentaires de Trump sont la première attaque d’un président en exercice sur cette corruption systématique depuis la condamnation du “complexe militaro-industriel” par le président Eisenhauer dans son discours d’adieu du 17 janvier 1961 (il y a presque exactement 60 ans).
Obama, ou Harris, malgré tout leur multiculturalisme, sont incapables de faire une telle déclaration parce qu’ils ont accédé au pouvoir politique sur le dos du capital-investissement et du capital-risque, des organisations qui tirent une grande partie de leur argent des ventes d’armes, de la promotion d’accords de “libre-échange” centrés sur les entreprises et de l’élimination de toutes les barrières au déchaînement du capital mondial dans le monde.
En outre, le discours d’adieu de Trump lui-même s’adressait aux soldats ordinaires et critiquait les généraux politiques qui utilisent l’armée comme un moyen d’amasser des richesses.
Sa tentative de se lier aux soldats ordinaires, et de s’opposer aux profiteurs militaires, semble être un sentiment sincère, et non une posture politique.
9. Appel à la nationalisation de la Réserve fédérale
Donald Trump a fait un effort sérieux pour placer la Banque de réserve fédérale des États-Unis sous le contrôle du département du Trésor et pour mettre un frein à l’utilisation de la dette américaine par la finance mondiale à ses propres fins.
Il est difficile d’évaluer le succès de cet effort de contrôle de la création monétaire, car les médias sont contrôlés par les mêmes institutions financières qui dominent le système de la Réserve fédérale. Les rapports (à la fois pro et anti-Trump) sont troubles et obscurs.
De plus, parce que la politique financière de la Réserve fédérale, et du département du Trésor, est de plus en plus rendue confidentielle, il est impossible d’avoir une discussion publique sérieuse sur la politique fiscale.
La décision de Trump de faire appel à Larry Fink, le PDG de la société d’investissement multimilliardaire BlackRock, pour jouer un rôle central au sein de la Réserve fédérale est au mieux une victoire à la Pyrrhus.
Les partisans de Trump affirment qu’au moins les Rothschild ne contrôlent plus la Réserve fédérale. Honnêtement, je ne sais pas quels rapports croire sur le statut de la Réserve fédérale aujourd’hui.
Ce qui est clair, cependant, c’est que le vol de milliers de milliards de dollars de la Réserve fédérale l’année dernière était une réalité, et que Trump a essayé, peut-être sans succès, de faire quelque chose.
Le procès spectacle à venir de Donald Trump
Trump a payé un prix pour avoir parlé de profit de guerre et d’autres conspirations criminelles pendant l’élection. Il a soudainement été diagnostiqué positif au COVID19 le 11 octobre et sa campagne a été arrêtée précisément au moment où il commençait à faire de la discussion sur les conspirations criminelles un élément central de la campagne.
Mais ce n’était que le début de l’attaque. Les médias corporatifs l’ont dépeint comme un chef terroriste, à l’instar d’Oussama Ben Laden, qui incitait ses partisans racistes à commettre une “insurrection armée”. Mais l’occupation du Capitole ressemblait plus à un spectacle de Laurel et Hardy qu’à une attaque ou une insurrection sérieuse et de multiples rapports ont soulevé de sérieux doutes quant à ce qui s’est réellement passé. Inutile de dire qu’aucun progressiste ne demande une enquête internationale.
Les avocats de M. Trump ne seront pas en mesure de répondre aux attaques injustes dont il a fait l’objet de la part des médias pendant le procès en destitution, ni de présenter des preuves concernant ses contributions au rétablissement de l’État de droit aux États-Unis.
Ces avocats ne pourront pas non plus démontrer que les actions criminelles qui ont eu lieu pendant l’administration de Trump étaient pour la plupart la faute d’un pouvoir exécutif qui ne peut plus être contrôlé par le président. Ils ne pourront pas décrire comment Trump a été piégé pour ce procès spectacle afin de détourner l’attention de crimes plus importants.
Tous leurs efforts doivent être consacrés à la défense de Trump contre l’accusation selon laquelle il aurait été le cerveau de la violente insurrection armée au Capitole destinée à empêcher l’élection de Joe Biden à la présidence.
En d’autres termes, ce procès a ouvert la porte à l’utilisation de toute la force du gouvernement fédéral pour traiter toute personne qui remet en question le régime des vaccins, ou qui demande des enquêtes sur des conspirations comme le 11 septembre, comme un terroriste national.
Nous avons l’obligation, non seulement pour le bien de Donald Trump, mais aussi pour l’avenir de nos enfants, de condamner ouvertement cette tentative manifestement criminelle de préparer une “insurrection” et de la mettre sur le dos du président.
Trump est à la fois un lutteur professionnel, un animateur de jeux télévisés et un mafieux. Je ne lui achèterais pas une voiture d’occasion, mais on sent chez lui une certaine loyauté et une certaine décence, alors même qu’il joue un jeu politique impitoyable.
Il a l’humanité et l’attachement personnel du gangster. Trump n’était peut-être pas fait pour être président, mais il est plus transparent que les démocrates qui prient en secret à l’autel de la finance mondiale.
Peu importe ce que vous pouvez penser de son goût étrange, de ses multiples mariages, de ses déclarations sensationnalistes ou de ses partisans, Trump a pris de nombreuses mesures pour rechercher la vérité qui l’ont mis en danger et qui méritent notre respect à contrecœur.
Emanuel Pastreich est Président de l’Asia Institute, un groupe de réflexion ayant des bureaux à Washington DC, Séoul, Tokyo et Hanoï. Pastreich est également directeur général de l’Institute for Future Urban Environments. M. Pastreich a déclaré sa candidature à la présidence des États-Unis en tant qu’indépendant en février 2020.
The war of multinational corporations on the Earth’s citizens
Turning us into passive obedient consumers
Corporations, multinational investment banks, and the super-rich that hide behind them, have launched the final stage this year of a ruthless war of a tiny few against the great majority of humanity.
Although they pay off their puppets in the media to float happy tales of some happy resolution to the dire situation of the moment, they already know that the die is cast, that they are committed to a strategy of distracting, seeding division, undermining rational thinking and using a combination of blatant intimidation with open bribery to slowly, systematically, overpower and reduce to slavery 99.98% of the Earth’s population. They know already, according to the calculations of their supercomputers, what will happen if they are not successful in this plan. They also know that catastrophic climate change and biodiversity loss will make it impossible for them to monopolize the wealth and the resources for long.
There is literally no limit to how far they will go.
The tools they use to pursue this war against the citizens of the Earth are technology, propaganda and disinformation campaigns, threats against individuals who display leadership skills and massive bribes for the leaders who are allowed to be covered in the media to represent the conservative and the progressive causes.
They also employ as part of this strategy an intimate knowledge of certain key weaknesses in the brain, and the potential for exploiting the human inclination to determine truth based on a vague sense of the mood of the herd, rather than logic. That is to say they are investing billions in hidden money to systematically create social pressure that makes citizens conform with pointless mandates for masks or vaccines that are launched from diverse platforms as a means of inducing the population to police itself.
Without such a strategy, the super-rich could not possibly seize control of the entire Earth.
There has been extensive research by corporations, and by the CIA and Department of Defense (government organizations exploited to hide the true entities demanding such research) into how humans can be manipulated without their knowledge, and compelled through imperceptible persuasion to permit, or even aid, their own disenfranchisement without us even being aware of this silent and invisible takeover.
Such operations have been undertaken before, but never on this global scale. New developments in supercomputing and the global integration of, and deregulation of, finance, has made such a master plan possible for the first time.
Recent developments are best viewed as the final acceleration of a process by which corporations bribed and lobbied all authority figures in government and academics to go along with a process of privatization, commercialization and automation that now means that a tiny handful of people can control every aspect of human experience in an absolute sense while the vast majority of citizens cannot even conceive of what it taking place. We have not reached that state yet, but Elon Musk, Bill Gates and others believe, based on the calculations of supercomputers, that it is now possible.
The super-rich have also invested wisely to establishment of a panoply of sham activists, or toothless, “feel good, do nothing” NGOs. These “movements” are allowed to appear in the corporate controlled media, and they pretend to respond to corporate power, but they purposely discourage citizens from organizing themselves (they ask only for donations, or attendance at protests, but they pointedly do not empower people to form their own groups or achieve financial and ideological independence). Such NGOs are silent about the mass manipulation of the media and of politics by global finance—even though that is the primary cause of the political problems we face.
If we follow the current trajectory, there will not be a single part of our lives that is completely controlled by a multinational corporation in the next few years.
We do not have that long to act.
The push for mandatory COVID19 “vaccines” in the face of the overwhelming scientific evidence against them is not a matter of mistaken science or bad policy. It is rather a process of preparing government officials, doctors, reporters and other media figures to follow orders from above which have no rational basis. After this “softening up process,” which is carefully calibrated on the basis of secret CIA torture programs designed to test the weaknesses of the human psyche, a rougher and more brutal form of rule can be implemented.
The mask mandate was the first step in the implementation of this form of massive psychological warfare. It is, to use the technical term, a slow “rape of the mind.”
The enormous restructuring of governance and the economy described by the World Economic Forum as the “Great Reset” is not a secret and anyone who takes the time to read that book, and related documents, can figure out about 70% of what is their agenda is.
The citizen will be convinced that he or she operates within a functional country and that there is some process by which the politicians at the top take actions on their behalf. But the super-rich care nothing for nation states and their populations and they use politicians to deflect attention away from themselves. Every time a politician takes a fall, it is to distract you from the predations of the rich. Every attack on minorities is a trick to get you hooked on race and diversity and distracted from the concentration of wealth.
We are increasingly subject to the whims of unaccountable global powers, and the intentionally render us passive, open to persuasion, and therefore incapable of resistance, by the media that is controlled by those powers.
The super-rich rely on two approaches to psychological manipulation that go back to the 1930s and before but have been perfected by recent research.
The first technique is the use of traumatic events that are reported on in a sensationalist and unscientific manner in the media so as to induce a deep sense of shock, disorientation and confusion in the population as a whole. The mental trauma of such events, whether the 9.11 incident, or the hyped-up COVID19 crisis, or the “armed insurrection” at the Capitol, is used to induce passivity and receptivity to profound institutional shifts that would otherwise be impossible.
Naomi Klein describes this approach as the “shock doctrine” and although she hesitates to delve too deeply into the degree to which it has become national policy, she accurately traces the approach back to the torture programs designed to test the limits of the human psyche.
Such trauma effects the reactive and emotional part of the human brain known as the amygdala, bringing on a “fight or flight” response in the psyche that overrides the rational, integrative, response to external events that would be carried out by the prefrontal cortex in normal conditions. Because we as individuals, and as populations, are unaware of how the amygdala has taken over decision making from the prefrontal cortex because of these engineered shocks, we are unable to organize, or even conceive of, a response to the real threat. Instead, we focus on the cooked up threats offered to us by the commercial media like Islamic terrorism in the case of 9.11 or the spread of a dangerous virus in the case of the COVID19 operation.
The second strategy is to induce a hypnotic state in the brain of the individual, and the population as a whole, through the constant repetition of certain themes and images through advertisements, commercials, images, and themes articulated in movies, TV shows, reporting and even the packaging of products.
The stimulation alternates between the intentionally boring and distracting images and direct appeals to the pleasure centers of the brain such as the desire for food, for sexual arousal, or for pleasant experiences.
The advertisements promoting the enjoyment of food and encouraging low-level sexual arousal are not only, or even primarily, aimed at selling products. They are intended to induce a state of passivity in the population.
The CIA explains the process,
“Hypnosis is basically a technique which permits acquisition of direct access to the sensory motor cortex and pleasure centers, and lower cerebral (emotional) portions of the right side of the brain following successful disengagement of the stimulus screening function of the left hemisphere of the brain. The right hemisphere, which functions as the noncritical, holistic, nonverbal and pattern-oriented component of the brain, appears to accept what the left hemisphere passes to it without question. Consequently, if the left hemisphere can be distracted either through boredom or through reduction to a soporific, semi-sleep state, external stimuli to include hypnotic suggestions are allowed to pass unchallenged into the right hemisphere where they are accepted and acted on directly.”
(FOIA document “Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process” June 9, 1983 (US Army Intelligence and Security Command)
This scale of mass hypnosis to render the citizens of all the world them passive, and unable to resist persuasion from authority figures is unprecedented. This process is being undertaken slowly, over months and years following complex algorithms, that are kept secret.
It is critical in this process that individuals be isolated from each other, unable to communicate except through mediums controlled by multinational corporations, and that they be offered only ineffective and superficial organizations to join, organizations in which they will be incapable of participating in the decision-making process, or of effecting change. Quarantine, lockdowns, social distancing and the promotion of a narcissistic consumption culture are critical to that process.
The result is that the citizens of the United States, and around the world, are being reduced to consumers of products supplied by multinational corporations who cannot even conceive of how the world has been radically transformed in this great reset.
They are being rendered passive and unresponsive so that the super-rich can quickly seize complete control of the systems by which countries are governed, by which money and finance are determined, the media by which information is distributed, the universities and research institutes by which authoritative perspectives backed by science are presented, the farms and distribution systems by which food is provided, the aquafers and irritation systems by which water is provided, and every other aspect of human experience.
When we awake from this slumber, if we ever do, we will discover that every aspect of our lives is controlled by unaccountable powers which we cannot understand, which we have no way to challenge and which will increase slowly and systematically the means by which we are made slaves, and, if necessary, destroyed.